2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-016-1368-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parameter-free variational coupling approach for trimmed isogeometric thin shells

Abstract: The non-symmetric variant of Nitsche's method was recently applied successfully for variationally enforcing boundary and interface conditions in non-boundary-fitted discretizations. In contrast to its symmetric variant, it does not require stabilization terms and therefore does not depend on the appropriate estimation of stabilization parameters. In this paper, we further consolidate the non-symmetric Nitsche approach by establishing its application in isogeometric thin shell analysis, where variational coupli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that there exists a nonsymmetric penalty‐free variant of Nitsche's method that does not require stabilization. ()…”
Section: Variational Formulation and Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that there exists a nonsymmetric penalty‐free variant of Nitsche's method that does not require stabilization. ()…”
Section: Variational Formulation and Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where γ 1 and γ 2 are penalty parameters. It is straightforward to consider alternative constrain enforcement techniques, like the Nitsche method [33,34] or Lagrange multipliers [31,35]. As usual, the discrete finite element equilibrium equations are derived by first writing the potential (41) as a sum over the set of reference elements { e } using the Jacobian |∂X/∂η|.…”
Section: Thin-shell Formulation and Discretisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Nitsche's technique in the imposition of interpatch-continuity also represents a common and well explored alternative [5,44,[47][48][49][50][51][52]. While such option is clearly superior to the use of simpler approaches, it is less efficient in implementation and computational costs, in the sense that it requires modifying the variational form as well as evaluating boundary integrals at the boundaries of interest.…”
Section: Analysis-related Enhancement Of Geometrical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%