2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10764-012-9600-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Papionin Multilevel Society as a Model for Hominin Social Evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
2
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The sorts of tools Oldowan hominins may have made from perishable materials are unknown, even though analogy with nonhuman primates and hunter-gatherers suggest they existed (Panger et al, 2003;Plummer, 2004 (Ungar, 2012), analogy with living humans and non-human primates (Peters & O'Brien, 1981;O'Connell et al, 1999;Wrangham et al, 1999), actualistic studies of potential plant food availability from modern ecosystems (Sept, 1994;Peters &Vogel, 2005;Copeland, 2009), and mechanical properties of potential wild plant foods (Dominy et al, 2008) suggest that Oldowan hominins could have consumed a variety of plant foods, although the actual species of plants and types of plant products that were consumed are unknown. Social behaviors, such as the type of hominin mating systems, and the scale and extent of food-sharing, are also difficult to address with the paleoanthropological record (Swedell & Plummer, 2012). The use-wear analysis of Oldowan artifacts from Kanjera adds value to the zooarchaeological, lithic, and isotopic analyses being carried out at the site, by identifying suites of behaviors that would 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 normally be invisible archaeologically, and by corroborating behaviors inferred through other analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sorts of tools Oldowan hominins may have made from perishable materials are unknown, even though analogy with nonhuman primates and hunter-gatherers suggest they existed (Panger et al, 2003;Plummer, 2004 (Ungar, 2012), analogy with living humans and non-human primates (Peters & O'Brien, 1981;O'Connell et al, 1999;Wrangham et al, 1999), actualistic studies of potential plant food availability from modern ecosystems (Sept, 1994;Peters &Vogel, 2005;Copeland, 2009), and mechanical properties of potential wild plant foods (Dominy et al, 2008) suggest that Oldowan hominins could have consumed a variety of plant foods, although the actual species of plants and types of plant products that were consumed are unknown. Social behaviors, such as the type of hominin mating systems, and the scale and extent of food-sharing, are also difficult to address with the paleoanthropological record (Swedell & Plummer, 2012). The use-wear analysis of Oldowan artifacts from Kanjera adds value to the zooarchaeological, lithic, and isotopic analyses being carried out at the site, by identifying suites of behaviors that would 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 normally be invisible archaeologically, and by corroborating behaviors inferred through other analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skill-based acquisition of foods that could be shared within a group, and be used to provision subadults who were unlikely to meet their own nutritional needs, may thus have been an important component of hominin socioecology at Kanjera South (Oliver, 1994;Kaplan et al, 2000;Aiello & Key, 2002;Schuppli et al, 2012;Swedell & Plummer, 2012;Crittenden et al, 2013). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 Finally, while it is possible that the use-wear derives from activities that were carried out "on-site," or in the immediate vicinity of the Kanjera South locality, quartzite and possibly quartz were transported over 10 km to the site.…”
Section: Non-food Processing Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baboons have been used as analogs for spawning ideas about human social evolution for two reasons: first, many taxa dwell in environments similar to those inhabited by our forebears (i.e., savanna-woodland habitats) (3); second, others exhibit a human-like social organization (4). Guinea baboons have until recently remained largely neglected by the primatological and anthropological community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reconstructions of the evolutionary pathways leading to these systems in papionins (and hominins) point to a pattern whereby ancestrally mixed-sex groups underwent permanent internal fission in response to a mixture of social and ecological pressures. This step could have been favored by spatial dispersion of food coupled with male monopolization of females (or female-initiated protective bonds with males) (4,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macaca mulatta : Sherman, 1980; Macaca nemestrina and Macaca arctoides : Weigel, 1980; Macaca fuscata fuscata: Corradino, 1990) and multilevel society groups (e.g. Theropithecus gelada: SnyderMackler et al, 2012; Papio hamadryas: Schreier & Swedell, 2012;Swedell & Plummer, 2012;Rhinopithecus roxellana: Zhang et al, 2012). 1 Social structure in animal groups can be affected by many factors, such as kinship (Furuichi, 1984;Matsumura & Okamoto, 1997;Silk, 2002), age classes (de Waal & Luttrell, 1986), resource holding potential (Barrett & Henzi, 2006), and resource availability (Henzi et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%