29th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1993
DOI: 10.2514/6.1993-2347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical analysis of supersonic flow over an axisymmetric afterbody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both studies addressed the effectiveness of turbulence models in representing adequately the evolution of the flow field. In the study of Tucker and Shyy [12], an extension to the k-e-based modeling approach (referred to here as Eke) gave a better accounting of the flow field development than the unmodified model (Ske), which was in sharp contrast to the results that were seen in our calculations [11]. The particular form of the models of turbulence are not relevant for this study.…”
Section: Treatment Of Convective Fluxescontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both studies addressed the effectiveness of turbulence models in representing adequately the evolution of the flow field. In the study of Tucker and Shyy [12], an extension to the k-e-based modeling approach (referred to here as Eke) gave a better accounting of the flow field development than the unmodified model (Ske), which was in sharp contrast to the results that were seen in our calculations [11]. The particular form of the models of turbulence are not relevant for this study.…”
Section: Treatment Of Convective Fluxescontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…In a prior study of the axisymmetric afterbody flow field [11], results obtained with the artificial dissipation scheme-based approach (of computing the inviscid fluxes) were not consistent with previously published results of the same flow field [12]. Both studies addressed the effectiveness of turbulence models in representing adequately the evolution of the flow field.…”
Section: Treatment Of Convective Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Sarkar (1992) introduced a simplified model, that algebraically relates the pressure-dilatation to quantities 36 obtained in incompressible closures. Tucker & Shyy (1993) and, more recently, Krishnamurty & Shyy (1997) made an assessment of K − ε model RANS calculations of the UIUC flow using the full NavierStokes equations. They incorporated the above mentioned as well as additional compressibility extensions and showed some improvement over previous results.…”
Section: Turbulence Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They incorporated the above mentioned as well as additional compressibility extensions and showed some improvement over previous results. However, Tucker & Shyy (1993) found that the eddy viscosity in the recirculation region and the K-level in the shear layer were overpredicted and mentioned that the model did not account for baroclinic torque, which is an important factor in the TKE budget.…”
Section: Turbulence Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al [11] employed a ux-vector splitting lower-upper symmetric successive overrelaxation scheme, and deduced that reduction of the base pressure and recirculation zone could cause di culties in ignition and ameholding in Scramjet combustors. Tucker and Shyy [12] introduced the FDNS code [14], in which k-turbulence model was corrected to treat compressible ows. Halupovich et al [13] utilized the PHOENICS code and k-turbulence model to investigate the supersonic backstep ow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%