2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83907-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel technology to integrate imaging and clinical markers for non-invasive diagnosis of lung cancer

Abstract: This study presents a non-invasive, automated, clinical diagnostic system for early diagnosis of lung cancer that integrates imaging data from a single computed tomography scan and breath bio-markers obtained from a single exhaled breath to quickly and accurately classify lung nodules. CT imaging and breath volatile organic compounds data were collected from 47 patients. Spherical Harmonics-based shape features to quantify the shape complexity of the pulmonary nodules, 7th-Order Markov Gibbs Random Field based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between 3D MRA‐CapsNet‐DL_B and the best SVM fusion model is only 0.73%. Compared with some binary classification methods in literatures, 39–42 although our results are partially suboptimal, our performed four‐classification task is more difficult than the binary classification tasks. In addition, the constructed aided diagnosis model does not need to design and extract traditional manual features, nor does it use additional supplementary information such as serum biomarkers, and it can achieve good and stable performance in the classification of multiple pathological types of pulmonary nodules by only using CT image information.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference between 3D MRA‐CapsNet‐DL_B and the best SVM fusion model is only 0.73%. Compared with some binary classification methods in literatures, 39–42 although our results are partially suboptimal, our performed four‐classification task is more difficult than the binary classification tasks. In addition, the constructed aided diagnosis model does not need to design and extract traditional manual features, nor does it use additional supplementary information such as serum biomarkers, and it can achieve good and stable performance in the classification of multiple pathological types of pulmonary nodules by only using CT image information.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In order to more comprehensively verify the classification performance of the constructed 3D MRA‐CapsNet‐DL aided diagnosis model, we compared the 3D MRA‐CapsNet‐DL model with six multi‐modal fusion models 16,17,39–42 . The comparison results are shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhou et al used an autoencoder-based DL to learn the latent representative features of MS data and thereby detected paragangliomas and ovarian cancer with accuracies> 95% [76] . Shaffie et al implemented a DL autoencoder classifier framework using CT scan images and breath-based volatile metabolic marker data as inputs to achieve over 97.8% accuracy in lung cancer diagnosis [77] . Furthermore, DL models can facilitate network inference, including metabolite–metabolite interactions within a biochemical pathway.…”
Section: Potentials Of Deep Learning In Tumor-associated Metabolic Pa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood-based molecular biomarkers and radiomics have been employed in combination to diagnose early-stage lung cancer with improved sensitivity and specificity [ 6 ]. Similarly, combining information from LDCT and volatolomics can improve the accuracy of lung cancer detection [ 31 ]. Further studies will be needed to better understand the most efficacious approach to integrating these modalities into LDCT.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%