2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel state space method for force identification based on the Galerkin weak formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A noise of 5% level is added to the measured responses before identifying the input force. All parameters and boundary conditions of this numerical model are the same as the one solved by Wang et al. (2015).…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A noise of 5% level is added to the measured responses before identifying the input force. All parameters and boundary conditions of this numerical model are the same as the one solved by Wang et al. (2015).…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFGM is compared with the four methods, which are the Galerkin weak formulation (GW) (Wang et al., 2015), Tikhonov regularization method (TM), state space (Law and Yong, 2011), and Newmark (Liu et al., 2014) methods. The relative errors of the input forces identified by the five methods are shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regularization-based methods mainly focus on finding a possible identified result, which can provide structural responses close to the measured ones as well as satisfy some prior information (Aucejo, 2014; Jacquelin et al, 2003; Li and Lu, 2016). Existing regularization methods used in the FR field include Tikhonov regularization (Li and Hao, 2016; Pan et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2015), truncate singular value decomposition (TSVD) (Lai et al, 2016), multiplicative regularization (Aucejo and De Smet, 2017), sparse regularization (Bao et al, 2016; Pan et al, 2018; Qiao et al, 2017; Rezayat et al, 2016), basis function methods (Qiao et al, 2015), and so on. In recent years, the sparse regularization has drawn lots of attentions (Hou et al, 2018a; Nagarajaiah and Yang, 2017; Yang and Nagarajaiah, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers in References [20,21] have discussed optimal arrangement of response sensors in dynamic loading identification processes through a large number of simulations and experiments. However, in actual engineering conditions, arrangement of response sensors is affected by structural design and external working environment [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%