2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel node-based smoothed finite element method with linear strain fields for static, free and forced vibration analyses of solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Figure 2, when the penalty factor α varies within the range between 10 and 10 8 , the objective function value will be close to zero, namely, the nonpenetrating constraints expressed in equation (7) can be satisfied and the system will be stable. So, the penalty factor α can be taken as 10 8 .…”
Section: Selection Of Penalty Factor From Equations (3) and (23)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Figure 2, when the penalty factor α varies within the range between 10 and 10 8 , the objective function value will be close to zero, namely, the nonpenetrating constraints expressed in equation (7) can be satisfied and the system will be stable. So, the penalty factor α can be taken as 10 8 .…”
Section: Selection Of Penalty Factor From Equations (3) and (23)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the contact problems, only very few of them can be solved by analytical methods, and most of them need to be simulated by numerical methods such as the Finite Element Method (FEM) [3,4] and the Boundary Element Method (BEM) [5,6]. e FEM is relatively mature and widely used [7][8][9][10]. However, the BEM has the advantages of dimension reduction, singularity adaptation, high precision, and so on [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the ability to simultaneously describe multivariate microstructure factors and complex process parameters (such as the melting factor model), we can indirectly establish the quantitative relationship between process and microstructure, and provide scientific guidance for coating performance improvement. At the same time, first-principles as well as finite element calculations [18] are used to optimize the composition and structure of the material. Some examples are: Establishing multiple regression equations, performing a significance test, removing insignificant variables and quantifying the magnitude of each influencing factor.…”
Section: Data Collection and Processing Of Materials Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2007), edge-based smoothed finite element method (ES-FEM) (Nguyen-Xuan et al. , 2012), node-based smoothed finite element method (NS-FEM) (Li and Liu, 2019) and smoothed extended finite element methods (Sm-XFEM) (Bordas et al. , 2010; Surendran et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remedy this issue, Duan et al (2012aDuan et al ( , b, 2014 developed a set of quadratically consistent integration (QCI) schemes for EFGM using quadratic base functions by correcting the nodal derivatives based on the consistency integration constrain between a nodal shape function and its derivatives. By combining the strain smoothing technique with the FEM and the XFEM, a series of numerical methods have been proposed for engineering analysis, such as smoothed finite element method (S-FEM) (Liu et al, 2007), edge-based smoothed finite element method (ES-FEM) (Nguyen-Xuan et al, 2012), node-based smoothed finite element method (NS-FEM) (Li and Liu, 2019) and smoothed extended finite element methods (Sm-XFEM) (Bordas et al, 2010;Surendran et al, 2017Surendran et al, , 2019Zhao et al, 2020), to name a few. Chen et al (2013) proposed the variationally consistent integration (VCI) by correcting test functions to the desire order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%