2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11099-016-0214-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for the estimation of soybean chlorophyll content using a smartphone and image analysis

Abstract: The development of smartphones, specifically their cameras, and imaging technologies has enabled their use as sensors/measurement tools. Here we aimed to evaluate the applicability of a fast and noninvasive method for the estimation of total chlorophyll (Chl), Chl a, Chl b, and carotenoids (Car) content of soybean plants using a smartphone camera. Single leaf disc images were obtained using a smartphone camera. Subsequently, for the same leaf discs, a Chl meter was used to obtain the relative index of Chl and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
37
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
37
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) for the same colour indices in current work (when red LED light passed through leaf) was found to be as 0.3047, 0.8355 and 0.797. The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of the present study for the linear regression among the R, G and B values with leaf Chl content are also higher than the results of Dey et al (2016), Rigon et al (2016) and Vesali et al (2017). When comparing the Chl a and Chl b in the present study, the estimation of the Chl a was higher than the Chl b.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) for the same colour indices in current work (when red LED light passed through leaf) was found to be as 0.3047, 0.8355 and 0.797. The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of the present study for the linear regression among the R, G and B values with leaf Chl content are also higher than the results of Dey et al (2016), Rigon et al (2016) and Vesali et al (2017). When comparing the Chl a and Chl b in the present study, the estimation of the Chl a was higher than the Chl b.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…This is why the laboratory extraction techniques use 663 and 645 nm wavelengths at the spectrophotometer to identify the Chl contents (Sudhakar et al, 2016). According to the authors' knowledge, many studies (Karcher and Richardson, 2003;Graeff et al, 2008;Li et al, 2010;Rorie et al, 2011;Lee and Lee, 2013;Tewari et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Saberioon et al, 2014;Dey et al, 2016;Rigon et al, 2016) were conducted before for the estimation of the leaf Chl contents by using image scanning techniques, but none of them tested red LED light sources. Therefore, the results of the present study provided a better correlation among the RGB values and leaf Chl content (mg • MW −1 ) than the previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…variação dentre as três classes definidas pode ser observada na Figura 17 com um exemplo de folhas em cada classe. Uma variação semelhante no padrão dos componentes RGB de acordo com o teor de N contido nas folhas neste experimento foram descritos para as clorofilas 'a' e 'b' e os carotenóides porRigon et al (2016) em folhas de soja (Glycine max L.) e porHu et al(2013) em arroz (Oryza sativa L.). Exemplo de folhas após classificação do status e respectivos valores RGB após processamento.…”
unclassified