2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3821-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel experience-based internet intervention for smoking cessation: feasibility randomised controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundThe internet is frequently used to share experiences of health and illness, but this phenomenon has not been harnessed as an intervention to achieve health behaviour change. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of a randomised trial assessing the effects of a novel, experience-based website as a smoking cessation intervention. The secondary aim was to measure the potential impact on smoking behaviour of both the intervention and a comparator website.MethodsA feasibility randomised c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another digital feasibility trial in the field of smoking cessation produced similar follow‐up rates to the current study with 75 per cent of the 87 participants randomised completing follow‐up measures (Powell et al. ). They reported slow initial recruitment rates, however, meaning that data collection for a full trial would take time and could be costly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Another digital feasibility trial in the field of smoking cessation produced similar follow‐up rates to the current study with 75 per cent of the 87 participants randomised completing follow‐up measures (Powell et al. ). They reported slow initial recruitment rates, however, meaning that data collection for a full trial would take time and could be costly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…After diagnosis, pwMS are confronted with a variety of management options and have to make complex decisions such as deciding on immunotherapies. PEx as a supplement to factual information may support pwMS in decision-making [ 16 18 , 23 , 25 , 28 ]. Using PEx is controversial because they appear to be randomly generated, situation-related, and possibly inaccurate with respect to scientific evidence and may bias decision-making [ 25 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, they fail to envision how their coping skills will help to manage the new situation and develop adaptation, which is important in decision-making processes [ 27 ]. Through PEx, patients may gain feelings of control and confidence facilitating self-management and coping uncertainty [ 16 , 17 , 23 , 25 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) There is limited but increasing research looking at the value of PEx. (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) The design and quality of these studies including PEx as an intervention varies. (19,25) Also, there is no agreed-upon operationalisation of PEx, which are also called narratives, exemplars, anecdotes, testimonials or case histories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(28) Through PEx, patients may gain feelings of control and con dence facilitating selfmanagement and coping uncertainty. (17,18,24,26,29) The internet provides a wide range of opportunities to share and learn about other PEx via blogs and discussion groups. Different motivations and mostly negative or dramatic experiences within the health system drive contributors to social media platforms, which lead to a selective picture of the disease, treatments and health care resources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%