2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel data preprocessing method for boosting neural network performance: A case study in osteoporosis prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 They have reported an increased classification performance with an AUC of 0.951 for 15 hidden layers, which is similar to the AUC of 0.962 at lumbar spine BMD and slightly lower than the AUC of 0.986 at femoral neck BMD evaluated in this study. The AUC (0.631) for the wrapper-based feature selection method was found to be higher than that without it (0.489) for identifying females with osteoporosis, 13 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 They have reported an increased classification performance with an AUC of 0.951 for 15 hidden layers, which is similar to the AUC of 0.962 at lumbar spine BMD and slightly lower than the AUC of 0.986 at femoral neck BMD evaluated in this study. The AUC (0.631) for the wrapper-based feature selection method was found to be higher than that without it (0.489) for identifying females with osteoporosis, 13 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…5,8,9 However, these models require strong assumptions to predict the relationship between disease risk and each risk factor. In recent years, use of classifier systems like multilayer perceptron, 10 Bayes classifier, 11 random forest classifier, 12 multilayer feed-forward neural network 13 and support vector machine (SVM) based on cortical 14,15 or trabecular bone features 16,17 has been developed for the detection of a low BMD or osteoporosis. Although all these classifiers delivered an acceptable diagnostic accuracy, they did not explain the input variables involved, the interpretations of experimental results or how they produced a predicted outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 200 million individuals suffer from osteoporosis worldwide [5], and there are about 9 million osteoporotic fractures happening each year [6], which represents a burden for society [7,8]. In osteoporosis, there is reduction of the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and disruption of the bone micro-architecture [9]. However, there are lack of direct methods to determine bone strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies were conducted in 2015, Iliou et al [ 31 ], used a set of 589 records extracted from the Greek population, who performed bone and laboratory densitometry examinations, applying a multilayer perceptron classifier with the tenfold cross-validation method. In this study, we considered three and five diagnostic factors for the prediction of osteoporosis risk, classifying them into three categories: normal, osteopenia and osteoporosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the number of variables Iliou et al [ 31 ], considered 35 parameters for the prediction of osteoporosis risk, to identify the most significant parameters, in this paper, a cross-validation method was used 10 times. With this data set it was possible to categorize individuals into three classes: normal, osteopenia and osteoporosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%