1977
DOI: 10.1109/tc.1977.1674830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Minimal Reed-Muller Canonical Forms of Switching Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A given function can be expressed as the XOR of basic entry; its coefficient is called the RM expansion coefficient [17]. Given an -variable function ( 1 , .…”
Section: Reed-muller Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A given function can be expressed as the XOR of basic entry; its coefficient is called the RM expansion coefficient [17]. Given an -variable function ( 1 , .…”
Section: Reed-muller Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach requires the exhaustive computation of all the 2" possible forms in tenns of "polarity functions" and obviously can not again handle functions with large number of variables.Following the first introduction of CGRM forms, being in Taylor series expansion[l], several schemes of minimization in Taylor series fonn were introduced in 70's[17],(38]. Marinkovic and Tosic[80] have proposed a non-exhaustive search for identifying the minimal CGRM form which allows different minimization criteria to be used.Kodandapani and Setlur(75] modified this approach for the case of minimization in terms of the number of the monoterms. Page [94] used a different modification to the method for minimizing the number of literals appearing in an even number of monotenns…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%