2013
DOI: 10.37236/2533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Note on Forbidding Clique Immersions

Abstract: Robertson and Seymour proved that the relation of graph immersion is well-quasi-ordered for finite graphs. Their proof uses the results of graph minors theory. Surprisingly, there is a very short proof of the corresponding rough structure theorem for graphs without K timmersions; it is based on the Gomory-Hu theorem. The same proof also works to establish a rough structure theorem for Eulerian digraphs without K t -immersions, where K t denotes the bidirected complete digraph of order t. * mdevos@sfu.ca. Suppo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an easy structure theorem for graphs excluding a fixed H as an immersion [15], [4]. If we fix the graph H and let ∆ be the maximum degree of a vertex in H, then one obvious obstruction to a graph G containing H as an immersion is if every vertex of G has degree less than ∆.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an easy structure theorem for graphs excluding a fixed H as an immersion [15], [4]. If we fix the graph H and let ∆ be the maximum degree of a vertex in H, then one obvious obstruction to a graph G containing H as an immersion is if every vertex of G has degree less than ∆.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 32 (following DeVos et al [10]). For every graph H with t vertices and every graph G that does not contain H as an immersion, there is a tree T and a T -partition of G with adhesion less than (t − 1) 2 , such that each bag has at most t − 1 vertices.…”
Section: Excluded Immersionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since every graph with maximum degree at most t − 2 contains no (strong or weak) K t immersion, the clustered chromatic number of graphs excluding a (strong or weak) K t immersion is at least 1 4 (t + 4) . The proof of Theorem 30 uses the following structure theorem from DeVos et al [10]. The theorem is not explicitly proved in [10], but can be derived easily from the proof of [10, Theorem 1] on page 4 of that paper.…”
Section: Excluded Immersionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A graph G contains a graph H as an immersion if the vertices of H can be mapped to distinct vertices of G, and the edges of H can be mapped to pairwise edge-disjoint paths in G, such that each edge vw of H is mapped to a path in G whose endpoints are the images of v and w. The image in G of each vertex in H is called a branch vertex. Structural and coloring properties of graphs excluding a fixed immersion have been widely studied [1,13,14,[18][19][20][22][23][24]34,36,40,42]. We prove that graphs excluding a fixed immersion have bounded nonrepetitive chromatic number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%