2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A note of caution when interpreting parameters of the distribution of excesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 3.1, we notice that the random variable V=σHξ()Gfalse(Zfalse) always follows the generalized Pareto H ξ (./ σ ). In hydrology, there is a long history of using the so‐called probability‐weighted moments (PWMs) to infer the parameters of a GPD (see, e.g., Carreau, Naveau, & Neppel, ; Hosking & Wallis, ; Naveau et al, ; Ribereau et al, ). The PWM estimation method is easy to understand, fast, robust, and efficient (if ξ <0.5, a reasonable assumption for our rainfall data).…”
Section: Methodology For Fitting a Semiparametric Egpd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Section 3.1, we notice that the random variable V=σHξ()Gfalse(Zfalse) always follows the generalized Pareto H ξ (./ σ ). In hydrology, there is a long history of using the so‐called probability‐weighted moments (PWMs) to infer the parameters of a GPD (see, e.g., Carreau, Naveau, & Neppel, ; Hosking & Wallis, ; Naveau et al, ; Ribereau et al, ). The PWM estimation method is easy to understand, fast, robust, and efficient (if ξ <0.5, a reasonable assumption for our rainfall data).…”
Section: Methodology For Fitting a Semiparametric Egpd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The red flag pointing toward an overestimation of could be the scatterplot between the estimates of and obtained by bootstrapping the original rainfall data (before thresholding). This last plot indicates that the variability in the estimation of can be large, ranging from zero to 0.8, and the clear negative correlation between the estimators of and is a well known feature of the GP parameter inference, that is, an overestimation of is coupled by an underestimation of and vice-versa (see, e.g., Ribereau, Naveau, & Guillou, 2011). As it is operationally impossible to repeat this visual inspection for our 180 weather stations and for different threshold values, this leaves us to wonder if the large estimate of for the Chartres station is just due to the inherent variability of GP fit for small samples (here, 40 exceedances above the 95% threshold).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Also, the shape and scale panels are almost symmetric: a posterior distribution granting most weight to comparatively high shape parameters concentrates on comparatively low scales. This corroborates the fact that frequentist estimates of the shape and the scale parameter are negatively correlated [ Ribereau et al ., ]. In the regional model as well as in the local one, the posterior variance of each parameter is reduced when taking into account historical data (except for the scale parameter at Anduze, for the local model).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter ν is less correlated with the other parameters, although there is a noticeable positive correlation with ξ. In applications, the end user is generally interested in return levels, which are functions of the four parameters of the model, and, thus, the errors made on individual parameters may compensate for one another [see also Ribereau, Naveau and Guillou (2011)]. Figure 10 compares various important characteristics of the extremal behavior of the data with those of the fitted model.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%