2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-isothermal thermodynamically consistent phase field framework for structural damage and fatigue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…h = f (ψ elas ). The fatigue phase-field damage models of [3] and [5] use h = h(ψ bulk = P :Ḟdt, ), while [2] sets h = f ( ,˙ ). We see micro-crack formation as a dissipative mechanism and therefore propose a load history variable depending on the energy dissipated under cyclic loading in the bulk:…”
Section: Fatigue Damage Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…h = f (ψ elas ). The fatigue phase-field damage models of [3] and [5] use h = h(ψ bulk = P :Ḟdt, ), while [2] sets h = f ( ,˙ ). We see micro-crack formation as a dissipative mechanism and therefore propose a load history variable depending on the energy dissipated under cyclic loading in the bulk:…”
Section: Fatigue Damage Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of the authors' knowledge, [3] was the first to consider fatigue damage in a phase-field model by introducing a fatigue history variable in the Ginzburg-Landau equation. [7] additionally introduced damage caused by aging, while [5] defined the internal fatigue history variable with a differential constitutive law to be found. [2] used a different approach and reduced the fracture toughness with cyclic loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model allows to describe fatigue crack initiation, propagation and residual fracture and can reproduce Paris behaviour. arXiv:1903.06465v3 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 23 Oct 2019 Recently, several propositions to extend the phase-field method to fatigue [16,17,18,19,20] have been published. Representatively for the range of different approaches, two models which are able to reproduce Paris behaviour shall be highlighted here: Carrara et al [19] introduce a phase-field model for fatigue fracture in brittle materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis of small deformation was considered. This model is an extension of the approach developed by Boldrini et al (2016) by including the fracture anisotropy in a similar manner as described by Clayton & Knap (2015), Nguyen et al (2017). The ideas presented by these authors were chosen due to the easiness of implementation and ability to capture the crack path dependency on the material symmetry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%