2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A noise correction-based approach to support a recommender system in a highly sparse rating environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…consumers' facial expression and related emotion) that requires a limited time of performance. In this way, our results reinforce the value of recommender systems in terms of value and time complexity reduction, as solicited by recent researches (Bag et al, 2019).…”
Section: Research Findingssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…consumers' facial expression and related emotion) that requires a limited time of performance. In this way, our results reinforce the value of recommender systems in terms of value and time complexity reduction, as solicited by recent researches (Bag et al, 2019).…”
Section: Research Findingssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the study does not provide an attribute analysis of all the previous NNM approaches in the literature nor direct comparisons in terms of datasets or algorithm complexities. One very recent study on NNM in RSs by Bag et al [15] introduced a sparsity-aware model by slightly amending the previous approach of Toledo et al in [9]. This study mentions few researches from the literature, however, it was very brief and lacked technical analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, process mining aims are at gathering data from process execution to prepare higher decisions, but this method works well for a structured process (static process). Bag et al 36 defined that RS is a good option for decision-making. In general, RS supports consumers but faces different challenges in sparse and noisy data.…”
Section: Desirable Performancementioning
confidence: 99%