2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new turbulence model for porous media flows. Part II: Analysis and validation using microscopic simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(12) and (13), the easiest and the most-used approach in the literature is to consider the equilibrium (Nakayama and Kuwahara 1999;Pedras and de Lemos 2001;Chandesris et al 2006;Teruel and Uddin 2009). At equilibrium, the flow is steady, uniform from macroscopic point of view, unidimensional with zero mean shear stress and fully developed.…”
Section: Production Of Turbulent Kinetic Energy: G I Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(12) and (13), the easiest and the most-used approach in the literature is to consider the equilibrium (Nakayama and Kuwahara 1999;Pedras and de Lemos 2001;Chandesris et al 2006;Teruel and Uddin 2009). At equilibrium, the flow is steady, uniform from macroscopic point of view, unidimensional with zero mean shear stress and fully developed.…”
Section: Production Of Turbulent Kinetic Energy: G I Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(39), the internal production of TKE is balanced by the dissipation at equilibrium in which the macroscopic production of TKE is zero (Chandesris et al 2006). Nakayama and Kuwahara (1999) and Teruel and Uddin (2009) used numerical experiment to determine ε ∞ . They solved the microscopic set of equations in a periodically fully developed flow through a staggered arrangement of square cylinders considered as porous media.…”
Section: Production Of Turbulent Kinetic Energy: G I Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations