2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-015-1372-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new topology optimization approach based on Moving Morphable Components (MMC) and the ersatz material model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
157
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 402 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
157
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussion on the similarities and differences of these approaches has recently been reported in Sigmund and Maute (2013). We note also another recently proposed topology optimization approach using moving morphable components (Guo et al 2014;Zhang et al 2015Zhang et al , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussion on the similarities and differences of these approaches has recently been reported in Sigmund and Maute (2013). We note also another recently proposed topology optimization approach using moving morphable components (Guo et al 2014;Zhang et al 2015Zhang et al , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in most topology optimization methods, the finite element method (FEM) with structured four‐node bilinear elements is employed in the displacement analysis. To enhance the computational efficiency, the ersatz material model is adopted for FEM analysis . Therefore, the elasticity tensor D e of the e th element is given by De=iN()1AenormalΩeρi()ΦdnormalΩDi,0.5eme=1,2,,Ne, where A e is the area of the e th element and the N e is the total number of the elements.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the methods listed in Table 1, two methods represent the structure as the union of primitive-shaped geometric components with fixed shape but variable dimensions and position: the moving morphable components method (Guo et al 2014a(Guo et al , 2016Zhang et al 2016b;2017b), and the geometry projection method (Bell et al 2012;Norato et al 2015;Zhang et al 2016a). The former method performs the topology optimization of a) 2d-structures, by employing as geometric components rectangles, approximated via superellipses, and quadrilateral shapes with two opposite sides described by polynomial and trigonometric curves; and b) 3d-structures, by using cuboids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 3 describes the projection of the supershapes onto a density field for the analysis. The computation of the signed distance to (Bell et al 2012(Norato et al 2015, 2016 (Zhang et al 2016a) Union of rectangular bars with straight (Bell et al 2012) or semicircular (Norato et al 2015) (Guo et al 2014b), 2016a (Zhang et al 2016b), 2016b (Guo et al 2016), 2017(Zhang et al 2017b Union of rectangles approximated as superellipses (Guo et al 2014b), or curved quadrilaterals with polynomial or trigonometric sides (Zhang et al 2016b;Guo et al 2016) Positions and orientation of discrete elements, dimensions (Guo et al 2014b) and curve parameters (Zhang et al 2016b;Guo et al 2016) Maximum of Heaviside function of individual geometric components XFEM to follow level set (Guo et al 2014b;Zhang et al 2016b), ersatz material from average of nodal smooth Heaviside (Guo et al 2016) Through union of Heavisides (bars merge, separate and are engulfed in other bars); no component insertion XFEM (Guo et al 2014b;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%