1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(98)00730-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new three-angle energy-dispersive diffractometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample temperature was estimated from the measured temperature of the cooling block by applying Newton's law of cooling. A collimated beam of polychromatic x-rays passed through the sample and Bragg scattered x-rays were intercepted at fixed scattering angles by a bank of three energy-dispersive Ge detectors [18]. The sample holder was cooled from 48 to −15 • C over 172 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample temperature was estimated from the measured temperature of the cooling block by applying Newton's law of cooling. A collimated beam of polychromatic x-rays passed through the sample and Bragg scattered x-rays were intercepted at fixed scattering angles by a bank of three energy-dispersive Ge detectors [18]. The sample holder was cooled from 48 to −15 • C over 172 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the oxygen volumes calculated were so different from the molecular dynamics, shock wave, and ISS values on which Figure 1a is based, we sought to improve our measurement procedures to either confirm or revise our initial efforts. First we devised a more comprehensive calibration procedure [ Walker et al , 2000] for the new three‐element energy‐dispersive detector on Station 16.4 SRS Daresbury [ Barnes et al , 1998]. Second, we devised more favorable sample illumination geometry for minimizing temperature gradient effects (Figure 3).…”
Section: Measurement Of Solid Phase Volumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were recorded on two beamlines: the angle-dispersive diffractometer 9.1 (Roberts et al, 1998) and on the energy-dispersive diffractometer 16.4 (Clark, 1996;Barnes et al, 1997). The choice of diffraction technique is important in determining the geometry of the measurement and the design of¯ow cells, as the detector angles and penetration of the beam vary considerably with photon energy.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%