2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new theropod dinosaur from the early cretaceous (Barremian) of Cabo Espichel, Portugal: Implications for spinosaurid evolution

Abstract: Spinosaurids are some of the most enigmatic Mesozoic theropod dinosaurs due to their unique adaptations to aquatic environments and their relative scarcity. Their taxonomy has proven to be especially problematic. Recent discoveries from Western Europe in general, specifically Iberia, provide some of the best specimens for the understanding of their phylogeny, leading to the description of the spinosaurid Vallibonavenatrix cani and the recognition of the Iberian dinosaur Camarillasaurus cirugedae as one of them… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(183 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…99 of Carrano & Sampson (2008) and concerning caudal neural spine morphology) was mis-scored and has been changed to state 1 to reflect their abbreviated state. All other scores and “OTUs” remained the same as in the Barker et al (2021) analysis, although we acknowledge the recent designation of the specimen ML 1190 as the holotype of the new spinosaurid taxon Iberospinus natarioi ( Mateus & Estraviz-López, 2022 ), which also includes some fragmentary new material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…99 of Carrano & Sampson (2008) and concerning caudal neural spine morphology) was mis-scored and has been changed to state 1 to reflect their abbreviated state. All other scores and “OTUs” remained the same as in the Barker et al (2021) analysis, although we acknowledge the recent designation of the specimen ML 1190 as the holotype of the new spinosaurid taxon Iberospinus natarioi ( Mateus & Estraviz-López, 2022 ), which also includes some fragmentary new material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as noted above, more convincing comparison can only take place when better corroboration pertaining to the proposed axial position of IWCMS 2018.30.3 occurs. Elsewhere on IWCMS 2018.30.3, the presence of pleurocentral depressions is also shared with the anterior caudal vertebrae of Vallibonavenatrix ( Malafaia et al, 2020b ) and Iberospinus ( Mateus & Estraviz-López, 2022 ), as well as the megalosaurids Torvosaurus , Megalosaurus and Wiehenvenator ( Rauhut, Huebner & Lanser, 2021 ; Rauhut & Pol, 2019 ).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monolophosaurus, Eustreptospondylus and Streptospondylus; have uncertain phylogenetic placement within Megalosauroidea, as well as Xuanhanosaurus, which was recovered as a piatnitzkysaurid by Rauhut et al [8] instead of a metriacanthosaurid as previously [6]. There recently has been an increase in the known biodiversity of Spinosauridae because some new taxa have been described, such as Ichthyovenator [13], Vallibonavenatrix [19], Ceratosuchops, Riparovenator [20] and Iberospinus [21].…”
Section: Megalosauroidea Lineagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] instead of a metriacanthosaurid as previously [6]. There recently has been an increase in the known biodiversity of Spinosauridae because some new taxa have been described, such as Ichthyovenator [13], Vallibonavenatrix [19], Ceratosuchops , Riparovenator [20] and Iberospinus [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinosauridae is an aberrant clade of long‐snouted, large‐bodied theropod dinosaurs, with representative taxa and key specimens known from the fossil records of Europe, Asia, Africa and South America (Allain et al, 2012; Barker et al, 2021; Charig & Milner, 1986; Dal Sasso et al, 2005; Ibrahim et al, 2014, 2020; Kellner et al, 2011; Malafaia et al, 2020; Mateus & Estraviz‐López, 2022; Sereno et al, 1998; Stromer, 1915; Sues et al, 2002). Generally limited to Lower to “mid” Cretaceous deposits (Bertin, 2010; Holtz et al, 2004), phylogenetic analyses nevertheless support a Jurassic origin for the clade (Barker et al, 2021; Carrano et al, 2012), although definitive material from this period remains unknown (Hendrickx et al, 2019; Soto et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%