2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2005.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new technique for the determination of contact time distribution (CTD) from tracers experiments in heterogeneous systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been used to explain χ overestimation in heterogeneous reactors when a classical residence time distribution (RTD) was first applied. The present system differs from those considered in Tayakout‐Fayolle et al32 because reactions proceeded only on the electrode surface, and not in a separate catalyst phase (e.g., porous catalyst pellet). The probability of reactant contact with the electrode depends on the overall RTD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been used to explain χ overestimation in heterogeneous reactors when a classical residence time distribution (RTD) was first applied. The present system differs from those considered in Tayakout‐Fayolle et al32 because reactions proceeded only on the electrode surface, and not in a separate catalyst phase (e.g., porous catalyst pellet). The probability of reactant contact with the electrode depends on the overall RTD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Under this assumption, reactions are considered to proceed uniformly within the reactor volume. The discrepancy between the assumed system and actual spatially nonuniform conditions in heterogeneous reactors has been treated by others using a catalyst‐phase contact time distribution 31, 32. This has been used to explain χ overestimation in heterogeneous reactors when a classical residence time distribution (RTD) was first applied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used observations of the decomposition of ozone in a fl uidised reactor to determine k¢ 4 and its variation with temperature and were then able to determine the distribution function by inverse Laplace transformation. Tayakout-Fayolle et al (2005) summarised earlier work by Nauman and Collinge (1968b) and demonstrated how to obtain G(t) by determining the residence time distributions for a reactor using two separate experimentsone with a non-adsorbable tracer and one with a weakly adsorbed tracer. It would appear that such experiments are undertaken industrially but few have been published (Nauman, 2008): one example on a large, cold model of a fl uidised bed has been described by Pustelnik and Nauman (1991).…”
Section: A Model For the Fl Uidised Bed Reactor With Continuous Feedimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With the foregoing, it is readily shown (Nauman and Collinge, 1968a;Tayakout-Fayolle et al, 2005) that for a fi rst-order reaction, the overall conversion, X, will be: 3.111] in which G(t) is the distribution of contact times and k¢ 4 = a p r bulk k 4 /e with the fi rst-order rate constant being given by r rxn,1 = -k 4 C, referred, as above, to unit area of catalyst surface. The fi rst measurement of G(t) was made by Orcutt et al (1962) who noted that Eq.…”
Section: A Model For the Fl Uidised Bed Reactor With Continuous Feedimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some commonly used methods to determine the RTD are the introduction of the tracer (of known concentration) by means of a pulse (E curve), the analysis of their concentration at the exit of this chamber, the effecting of a fluid change or step experiment (F curve), or the introduction of a sinusoidal variation of the concentration of tracer methods. From these, the pulse method is the easiest and most commonly used (Levenspiel 1999;Tayakout-Fayolle et al 2005). The utilized tracer is often a dye and its concentration is measured on the products by spectroscopy or colorimetry (Apruzzese et al 2003).…”
Section: Mixing On Microchannels and Residence Time Distribution (Rtd)mentioning
confidence: 99%