2007
DOI: 10.1186/1746-160x-3-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new technique for mandibular osteotomy

Abstract: Sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) is a surgical technique largely employed for mandibular mobilizations in orthognatic procedures. However, the traditional design of buccal osteotomy, located at the junction of mandibular ramus and body, may prevent more extensive sliding between the bone segments, particularly on the advance, laterality and verticality of the mandibular body. The author proposes a new technical and conceptual solution, in which osteotomy is performed in a more distal region, next to the mental f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The scans were performed on an i-CAT Classic (Imaging Science International, Hatfield, Pennsylvania, USA) using the following protocol: 0.3mm voxel and Extended Height 20/20sec. Next, they were submitted to the mandibular advancement procedure, which was performed by means of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible with advancement of 10mm using the cephalometric data and surgical plan transfer method 13,14 , which can be summarized as follows: sagittal osteotomy was performed on the mandible on one side without the split. The 2.0 system four role plate was positioned in the oblique line, parallel to the mandible occlusal plane and screwed with 2 screws only in the proximal fragment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The scans were performed on an i-CAT Classic (Imaging Science International, Hatfield, Pennsylvania, USA) using the following protocol: 0.3mm voxel and Extended Height 20/20sec. Next, they were submitted to the mandibular advancement procedure, which was performed by means of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible with advancement of 10mm using the cephalometric data and surgical plan transfer method 13,14 , which can be summarized as follows: sagittal osteotomy was performed on the mandible on one side without the split. The 2.0 system four role plate was positioned in the oblique line, parallel to the mandible occlusal plane and screwed with 2 screws only in the proximal fragment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods and devices to control the positioning of the proximal segment have been suggested over the years 8 with good results [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] or not 19,20 , maintaining unanswered questions on this topic 21 . There is no scientific evidence supporting the routine use of condylar positioning devices (CPD) in orthognathic surgery 19,22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Owing to maxillomandibular discrepancy, the patient underwent orthognathic treatment. During surgery, a mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy (Puricelli osteotomy) 6 was performed on the left side; a mandibular vertical ramus osteotomy on the right side; and a maxillary alveolar segmental osteotomy on the right side.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of complications and mortality are low after this type of surgery, thereby prompting its prevalence in the literature and in clinical practice. More far-reaching measures of permanent correction include mandibular advancement, genioglossal advancement, and hyoid myotomy suspension [118]. Hyoid myotomy suspension is achieved by placing a suture over the hyoid bone and pulling it anteriorly towards the mandible.…”
Section: Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%