2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41920-6_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Strategy for Case-Based Reasoning Retrieval Using Classification Based on Association

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Likert scale of each checklist was recoded dichotomously, with 1 indicating the presence of signs of ID, when the scale responses were 'sometimes', 'often', or 'very often', and with 0 when the responses were 'never' or 'rarely'. To generate the predictive models that checked the sensitivity of the checklist items compared to the diagnosis, the Classification Based on Associations (CBA) algorithm (Aljuboori et al, 2016) was used. To produce the models, algorithms were established to identify the checklist items that could be classified as predictors of ID diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Likert scale of each checklist was recoded dichotomously, with 1 indicating the presence of signs of ID, when the scale responses were 'sometimes', 'often', or 'very often', and with 0 when the responses were 'never' or 'rarely'. To generate the predictive models that checked the sensitivity of the checklist items compared to the diagnosis, the Classification Based on Associations (CBA) algorithm (Aljuboori et al, 2016) was used. To produce the models, algorithms were established to identify the checklist items that could be classified as predictors of ID diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CBA Algorithm (classification based on rules) used in this research is based on the a priori algorithm. The difference is that in the data set the class attributed is assigned, and the analysis of the rules is done assuming Y only the diagnosis characteristic (Chen et al, 2006;Thabtah and Cowling, 2007;Aljuboori et al, 2016). The purpose of the CBA, in the context of this research, is to generate rules from the associations checklist items that make it possible to establish the predictive model by checking the sensitivity indicators of the items (from the rules) compared to the diagnosis (Han et al, 2011).…”
Section: Strategic Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final strongest rules are in Group 7 which relate to (testBPS=PreHypn, fbs>120=FALSE, thal=FixedDefect) are extracted in (8,9,10,13,14,18) indicating their association to HeartDisease=yes. The confidence is (0.97, 0.95, 0.94, 0.90, 0.89, 0.83) which confirms the rules of Groups 3, 4 & 5, which have a strong relation between hypertension & diabetes with thalassemia.…”
Section: Mining Seci Model Secicarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous research, CARs have been used to demonstrate that classified rule patterns could be combined with a similar pattern, in the scope of; a colorectal cancer database [13], case-based reasoning. CARs have also been used in [14] to extract information concerning associations from a given case base using various approaches such as case-based reasoning [15,16]. Consequently, CAR as a DM tool can be used to discover significant relationships between risk factors implicated in target disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faia et al [11] used case-based reasoning, expert system, and collective intelligence to discuss issues related to energy reduction for building energy management systems. Aljuboori et al [12] proposed a case-based reasoning technique based on association rules to improve the performance of similarity-based retrieval and classed frequent pattern trees (FP-CAR) algorithms and to explore the technology and application of eliminating errors or ambiguous retrievals by case-based reasoning. Chung et al [13] developed a programming learning and diagnosis system built on case-based reasoning, which can provide feedback and suggestions to learners in a timely manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%