2017
DOI: 10.1080/03932729.2017.1371487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Regional Cold War in the Middle East and North Africa: Regional Security Complex Theory Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The heterarchic notion of multiple rankings of power relations is useful in the analysis of increasingly hybrid MENA political systems, where rather than weak statehood or multiple governance arrangements, war orders can be conceptualized as heterarchic orders of agencies of coercion whereby stateness is flexible (Leenders and Giustozzi, 2019) but also to regional orders (Hanau Santini, 2017; Hinnebusch, 2018). These applications to the MENA context have on the one hand deepened the previously under-developed IR application notion of heterarchy as a specific regional order premised neither on hierarchy nor anarchy.…”
Section: Traditional Security: Between Theoretical Reflection and Emp...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterarchic notion of multiple rankings of power relations is useful in the analysis of increasingly hybrid MENA political systems, where rather than weak statehood or multiple governance arrangements, war orders can be conceptualized as heterarchic orders of agencies of coercion whereby stateness is flexible (Leenders and Giustozzi, 2019) but also to regional orders (Hanau Santini, 2017; Hinnebusch, 2018). These applications to the MENA context have on the one hand deepened the previously under-developed IR application notion of heterarchy as a specific regional order premised neither on hierarchy nor anarchy.…”
Section: Traditional Security: Between Theoretical Reflection and Emp...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bliskoistočna konfliktna formacija vođena je tradicionalnom agendom teritorijalnih sporova, ideološkim nadmetanjem, rivalstvima oko moći i statusa i etničkim i kulturnim podelama (Buzan and Waever 2003, 193-194). Uprkos kulturnoj, društvenoj i verskoj sličnosti i postojanju pregršt regionalnih organizacija, debata o statusu Bliskog istoka se često svodi na ocene da se radi o "regionu bez regionalizma" (Aarts 1999;Santini 2017). Upravo suprotno regionalizaciji, region Bliskog istoka se od procesa dekolonizacije nalazi u nekoj vrsti permanentnog regionalnog hladnog rata, ali sa državama regiona kao glavnim akterima, kada su popustile stege koje je nametnulo nadmetanje supersila.…”
Section: Bliski Istok U Svetu Regionalnih Bezbednosnih Kompleksaunclassified
“…There are three "security complexes" in the Middle East broadly. 17 One comprises Israel and the Arab-world (the Levant), another North Africa, and the third covers the Gulf region, a highly precarious sub-region where Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia have been competing with each other for regional dominance (Hanau Santini, 2017). The Gulf security complex is inextricably linked with that of the larger Middle East given that the ambitions of the Saudi regime can hardly be isolated from similar concerns and interests in the wider Arab world.…”
Section: Interdependence Between Regime Security and Regional Security Complex In The Middle East: The Gulf Cooperation Councilmentioning
confidence: 99%