2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2016.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new pipid frog from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia and early evolution of crown-group Pipidae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cretaceous (Cannatella, 2015;Gómez, 2016), but the contribution of palaeontology to the evolutionary history of the South American Pipa is virtually null, since the only fossils putatively referred to this genus come from an undetermined Quaternary of Brasil and were reported (not figured or described) as identical to that of extant Pipa (Liais, 1872). This is quite surprising for a clade of anurans that is morphologically highly derived, with a well-known osteology (e.g., Trueb et al, 2000) and that is therefore potentially easily identifiable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Cretaceous (Cannatella, 2015;Gómez, 2016), but the contribution of palaeontology to the evolutionary history of the South American Pipa is virtually null, since the only fossils putatively referred to this genus come from an undetermined Quaternary of Brasil and were reported (not figured or described) as identical to that of extant Pipa (Liais, 1872). This is quite surprising for a clade of anurans that is morphologically highly derived, with a well-known osteology (e.g., Trueb et al, 2000) and that is therefore potentially easily identifiable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples of Pipa snethlageae were not available for this study and apparently not described or figured in the literature. As for the extinct pipids from South America, analogous ridges occur in Shelania pascuali from the Eocene of Patagonia, which is currently considered a Xenopodinae (Estes, 1975;Báez and Trueb, 1997;Báez et al, 2008;Gómez, 2016). This taxon, however, is characterized by the absence of a mid-dorsal crest (see for example Báez et al, 2008: fig.…”
Section: Stratigraphy and Agementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations