2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9101049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Online Service for the Validation of Multi-GNSS Orbits Using SLR

Abstract: In the last decade, we have been witnessing a rapid development of the constellations of Global and Regional Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS/RNSS). Besides the well-known GPS and GLONASS, newly developed systems such as Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS and NAVIC have become increasingly important. All satellites of new GNSS are equipped with laser retroreflector arrays (LRA) dedicated to Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR). SLR allows, e.g., an independent validation of microwave-based orbit products. Therefore, a fully ope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For GNSS, besides the six Keplerian parameters, seven parameters of the new Empirical CODE Orbit Model (ECOM2) were estimated, as they absorb much better the impact of solar radiation pressure for GLONASS and Galileo when compared to previous models dedicated to GPS orbit modeling . Despite the fact that 3 day orbital arcs are preferable for GNSS (Lutz et al, 2016), we generate 5 day overlapping arcs, as a trade-off between the validity and accuracy of ECOM2 parameters and the sufficient number of collected data (for details see Bury et al, 2017). Range biases constitute one of the most important issues when processing SLR observations to GNSS.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For GNSS, besides the six Keplerian parameters, seven parameters of the new Empirical CODE Orbit Model (ECOM2) were estimated, as they absorb much better the impact of solar radiation pressure for GLONASS and Galileo when compared to previous models dedicated to GPS orbit modeling . Despite the fact that 3 day orbital arcs are preferable for GNSS (Lutz et al, 2016), we generate 5 day overlapping arcs, as a trade-off between the validity and accuracy of ECOM2 parameters and the sufficient number of collected data (for details see Bury et al, 2017). Range biases constitute one of the most important issues when processing SLR observations to GNSS.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLR tracking of GNSS is typically used for the GNSS microwave-based orbit validation Montenbruck et al, 2015;Urschl et al, 2007). SLR-to-GNSS data can also be used for the GNSS orbit determination (Bury et al, 2017;Hackel et al, 2015;Pavlis, 1995), GNSS-SLR co-location in space that is independent from ground-based local ties (Bruni et al, 2018;Thaller et al, 2014), time transfer and GNSS onboard clock synchronization (Sadovnikov & Shargorodskiy, 2014), determination of GNSS antenna offsets , and the scale transfer from SLR to GNSS networks (Thaller et al, 2011).…”
Section: 1002/2017gl076850mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A joint adjustment of GNSS and SLR observations performed by Urschl et al (2007) provided an improvement of the determination of the semimajor axis of GNSS orbits. Urschl et al (2008) calculated the preliminary 9-day orbits of the very first Galileo, i.e., GIOVE-A, using solely SLR measurements and achieved the accuracy at the level of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 m in the radial, along-track, and cross-track direction, respectively. Montenbruck et al (2015b) calculated 14-day orbits using solely SLR data for two NavIC satellites, IRNSS-1A and IRNSS-1B.…”
Section: Slr Tracking Of Gnssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a unique geodetic survey technology without ambiguity, the SLR technology has always been used to validate the GNSS microwave-based orbits externally and to investigate the deficiency of the error model in the microwave-based orbit determination [20,[25][26][27][28][29][30]. In this contribution, the motivation of the SLR validation is to flag and eliminate the worse SLR observations, which can improve the precision and stability of SLR-only orbit determination.…”
Section: Slr Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%