2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28392-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new nonlinear method for calculating growing degree days

Abstract: Precise calculations of growing degree days (GDD) are an important component in crop simulation models and managerial decisions. Traditional methods for calculating GDD assume linear developmental responses to temperature and cannot precisely account for the delay in growth or development at temperatures above the optimal temperature (Topt). A new nonlinear method for calculating GDD was developed. Variations in the prediction of the dates since sowing to various developmental stages and performance measures f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Degree-days could be an important component in latent infection simulation models and managerial decisions. Traditional methods for calculating DD assume linear developmental responses to temperature and cannot precisely account for the delay in growth or development at temperatures above the optimal temperature [ 40 ]. Physiologically, we have assumed that below a certain base temperature level (0 °C), Monilinia spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degree-days could be an important component in latent infection simulation models and managerial decisions. Traditional methods for calculating DD assume linear developmental responses to temperature and cannot precisely account for the delay in growth or development at temperatures above the optimal temperature [ 40 ]. Physiologically, we have assumed that below a certain base temperature level (0 °C), Monilinia spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumulative performance under thermally variable conditions can then be estimated by integrating the TPC function, using experienced temperatures (Casagrande, Logan, & Wallner, 1987; Denny, 2019; Georges, Beggs, Young, & Doody, 2005; Niehaus, Angilletta, Sears, Franklin, & Wilson, 2012; Rollinson et al, 2018; Taylor & Shields, 1990; Worner, 1992). We note here that a recent nonlinear GDD approach has been developed, which closely resembles a TPC approach (Zhou & Wang, 2018). In contrast to traditional GDD approaches, a higher degree of accuracy is expected from using nonlinear approaches because error resulting from Jensen's inequality is minimized.…”
Section: The Fallacy Of the Average: Nonlinearity Of Thermal Performamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being non-linearly dependent on temperature and precipitation, the bivariate Gaussian model shares some common features with Cutforth and Shaykewich (1990), Streck et al (2007), Yin et al (1995), Zhou and Wang (2018). However, there are several major differences to previous work: firstly, the model incorporates both temperature and precipitation, allowing for potential interactions between their impacts on growth; secondly, the non-linear function is Gaussian rather than a Beta function (e.g.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Gaussian Yield Response Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%