A new noninvasive measurement system for wave intensity: evaluation of carotid arterial wave intensity and reproducibility

Abstract

Wave intensity (WI) is a new hemodynamic index that provides information about the dynamic behavior of the heart and the vascular system and their interaction. Carotid arterial wave intensity in normal subjects has two positive peaks. The first peak, W(1), occurs during early systole, the magnitude of which increases with increases in cardiac contractility. The second peak, W(2), which occurs towards the end of ejection, is related to the ability of the left ventricle to actively stop aortic blood flow. Between the two positive peaks, a negative area, NA, is often observed, which signifies reflections from the cerebral circulation. The time interval between the R-wave of ECG and the first peak (R - W(1)) corresponds to the pre-ejection period, and that between the first and second peaks (W(1) - W(2)) corresponds to ejection time. We developed a new ultrasonic on-line system for obtaining WI and arterial stiffness (beta). The purpose of this study was (1) to report normal values of various indices derived from WI and beta measured with this system, and (2) to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the measurements. The measurement system is composed of a computer, a WI unit, and an ultrasonic machine. The WI unit gives the instantaneous change in diameter of the artery and the instantaneous mean blood velocity through the sampling gate. Using these parameters and blood pressure measured with a cuff-type manometer, the computer gives WI and beta. We applied this method to the carotid artery in 135 normal subjects. The mean values of W(1), W(2), NA, R - W(1), and W(1) - W(2) were 8 940 +/- 3 790 mmHg m/s(3), 1 840 +/- 880 mmHg m/s(3), 27 +/- 13 mmHg m/s(2), 104 +/- 14 ms, and 270 +/- 19 ms, respectively. These values did not show a significant correlation with age. The mean value of beta was 10.4 +/- 4.8 and the values significantly correlated with age (men: r = 0.66, P < 0.0001; women: r= 0.81, P < 0.0001). The reproducibility was evaluated by intraobserver intrasession (IA), intraobserver intersession (IE), and interobserver intrasession variability (IO). The reproducibility of R - W(1) and W(1) - W(2) was high: the mean coefficient of variation (mCV) of IA was less than 3%; 95% confidence limits from the mean values (CL) were less than 8% for IE and less than 4% for IO. The reproducibility of W(1) and beta was good: mCV for IA was less than 10%; CL for IE and IO were less than 17%. W(2) and NA showed a higher variability than other indices: mCV for IA was less than 13%, and CL for IE and IO were less than 36%. However, two sessions by the same observer and two sessions by different observers were not biased. Wave intensity measurements with this system are clinically acceptable.

Comparing Accuracy of Cerebral Aneurysm Size Measurements From Three Routine Investigations: Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Digital Subtraction Angiography

“…The reported arterial stiffness parameter b for the internal carotid artery is 10.4 ± 4.8. 7,9,15) Therefore, the b of the model vessel was set at 10 to match that of the internal carotid artery. The aneurysm was designed with a dome of 14 mm in diameter and a neck of 5 mm width.…”

Selective association of endogenous ouabain with subclinical organ damage in treated hypertensive patients

“…The peak and bottom values of a diameter change waveform were calibrated using systolic and diastolic pressure measured with a cuff-type manometer applied to the upper arm, and the diameter change waveform was used as a blood pressure waveform. 25 …”

Clinical usefulness of wave intensity analysis

“…This system was incorporated in ultrasonic diagnostic equipment (SSD-6500, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan), which had a colorDoppler system for blood flow velocity measurements and an echo-tracking subsystem for diameter-change measurements with a linear array probe (5 MHz for color Doppler, 10 or 13 MHz for echo-tracking). We reported the details and reproducibility of this system elsewhere [22]. Briefly, by setting the tracking positions (displayed as small bars on the ultrasound beam line for echo tracking (line A in Fig.…”