2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new non-linear vortex lattice method: Applications to wing aerodynamic optimizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like the non-linear LLT method presented in the previous section, the predictive capabilities of the VLM can be enhanced by introducing, to a limited extent, viscous effects (23,24) . For each vortex ring, a correction is defined, so that the final values of the vortex intensities become…”
Section: Non-linear Vortex Lattice Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the non-linear LLT method presented in the previous section, the predictive capabilities of the VLM can be enhanced by introducing, to a limited extent, viscous effects (23,24) . For each vortex ring, a correction is defined, so that the final values of the vortex intensities become…”
Section: Non-linear Vortex Lattice Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach to LLT that addresses the viscosity and thickness effects limitations is to couple the 3D lift distribution from LLT to 2D airfoil data that can be obtained from either experiments [38,39] or a 2D-airfoil analysis tool [40], followed by iterating the 2D and 3D solutions until certain convergence criterion is met. Anderson et al successfully implemented this technique for modeling the stall behavior of finite wing with drooped leading edge [39].…”
Section: A Aerodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Şugar-Gabor et al implemented both LLT [41] and VLM [40] routines using XFOIL as twodimensional flow solver. Their LLT was validated against CFD for Mach numbers between M = 0.05 and M = 0.2 and angles of attack between α = −2 and α = +8 • .…”
Section: A Aerodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations