2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
300
2
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 411 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
300
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Poseidon group in 2015 introduced new criteria to identify the 'low prognosis patient' undergoing ART [12][13][14]. Based on female age, ovarian reserve, and previous history of ovarian stimulation -if available-, 'low prognosis' patients were stratified into four specific subgroups, each of which with a distinct prognosis concerning the likelihood of conceiving and delivering a baby with the use of ART ( Supplementary Figure 3).…”
Section: The Interpretation and Impact For Patients Undergoing Assistmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Poseidon group in 2015 introduced new criteria to identify the 'low prognosis patient' undergoing ART [12][13][14]. Based on female age, ovarian reserve, and previous history of ovarian stimulation -if available-, 'low prognosis' patients were stratified into four specific subgroups, each of which with a distinct prognosis concerning the likelihood of conceiving and delivering a baby with the use of ART ( Supplementary Figure 3).…”
Section: The Interpretation and Impact For Patients Undergoing Assistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary aim of the Poseidon criteria was to provide patient counselling and clinical guidance regarding interventions that could help these patients conceive in the shortest possible time. The most vulnerable Poseidon patients are those within groups 2 and 4, i.e., ageing patients 35 years or above, with (i) an unexpected suboptimal number of oocytes retrieved in a previous ART cycle despite a normal ovarian reserve (group 2), or (ii) low ovarian reserve in whom the number of oocytes resulting from ovarian stimulation is invariably low (group 4) [12,15,16]. The reason relates to the impact of maternal age and number of oocytes on the availability of euploid embryos, and thus, live birth.…”
Section: The Interpretation and Impact For Patients Undergoing Assistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the POSEIDON group (Patient - Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number) proposed a new classification of ART in patients with DOR or unexpected inappropriate ovarian response and four subgroups have been proposed based on quantitative as well as qualitative parameters which includeAge and expected anomaly rate,Ovarian biomarkers like AFC and AMH, andOvarian response – if an earlier stimulation was performed [74]. …”
Section: The Problem Of Poor Ovarian Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, i.e. from the viewpoint of the fertility specialist, it is interesting to note that proposals aiming at the evaluation of ovarian reserve do not mention to include thyroid function [49], [50].…”
Section: Thyroid Function Thyroid Antibodies and Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%