2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00793.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Model for University‐Industry Links in Knowledge‐Based Economies*

Abstract: In this paper, we apply the agent‐based SKIN model (Simulating Knowledge Dynamics in Innovation Networks) to university‐industry links. The model builds on empirical research about innovation networks in knowledge‐intensive industries with procedures relying on theoretical frameworks of innovation economics and economic sociology. Our experiments compare innovation networks with and without university agents. Results show that having universities in the co‐operating population of actors raises the competence l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the field of neo-Schumpeterian modeling started with Nelson and Winter (1982) implementing an ABM with technological competition, entry and exit, heterogeneity, autonomous decisions, and technology search. Others have implemented ABMs for the formation of supply chains and knowledge-based innovation networks (Gilbert et al, 2001), research conglomerates (Scholz et al, 2010), regional innovation systems (Korber et al, 2009), as well as industryuniversity research networks (Ahrweiler et al, 2011;Triulzi and Pyka, 2011) under operational, technological and existential uncertainties, as well as network inefficiencies. For a further discussion of issues of implementation, the reader is referred to the subsection on challenges of operationalization.…”
Section: Implementing the Required Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the field of neo-Schumpeterian modeling started with Nelson and Winter (1982) implementing an ABM with technological competition, entry and exit, heterogeneity, autonomous decisions, and technology search. Others have implemented ABMs for the formation of supply chains and knowledge-based innovation networks (Gilbert et al, 2001), research conglomerates (Scholz et al, 2010), regional innovation systems (Korber et al, 2009), as well as industryuniversity research networks (Ahrweiler et al, 2011;Triulzi and Pyka, 2011) under operational, technological and existential uncertainties, as well as network inefficiencies. For a further discussion of issues of implementation, the reader is referred to the subsection on challenges of operationalization.…”
Section: Implementing the Required Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universities also need to be able to effectively combine the new knowledge in their research projects. As Ahrweiler et al (2011) explain, the relation between knowledge inputs and technology outputs is not linear. Different actors follow different scientific and technological trajectories, and for universities, as for any other actor, there is no guaranteed success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is further refined in subsequent works in which it has been applied to study knowledge dynamics between innovation networks' agents (Ahrweiler et al, 2004a(Ahrweiler et al, , 2004b, to investigate the impact of different learning activities on agents' knowledge stocks , to highlight the persistency of cooperation activities in knowledge intensive industries and to investigate the existence and channels of knowledge spillovers among agents (Pyka et al, 2009). Further works have applied a modified version of the model to study the governance of EU-funded innovation networks (Pyka and Scholz, 2008) and to explore the role of science-technology links for innovation diffusion (Ahrweiler et al, 2011). We extend the original theoretical model to reproduce the innovation system of biotech and pharmaceutical industries, explicitly taking into account different classes of agents moved by diverse aims and rewards (universities, biotech and pharmaceutical firms), multiple channels of interactions (research collaborations, licensing and sponsored research) and different research outputs (three classes of patents and drugs).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ahrweiler, Pyka, and Gilbert (2011) have developed an agent-based SKIN model (Simulating Knowledge Dynamics in Innovation Networks) to university-industry links. Through an international case study, Abramo, D'Angelo, Costa, and Solazzi (2009) investigated public-private research collaborations between Italian universities and domestic industry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%