SAE Technical Paper Series 1995
DOI: 10.4271/952714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Model Comparing Impact Responses of the Homogeneous and Inhomogeneous Human Brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
92
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
92
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23 The UCDBTM was validated against cadaveric pressure responses conducted by Nahum et al 42 and brain motion research conducted by Hardy et al 19 Further validations were conducted by Doorly and Gilchrist 10 and Post et al 60 using reconstructions of real world traumatic brain injury incidents with results that were in agreement with anatomical tissue thresholds. The material characteristics of the model were taken from Ruan, 71 Willinger et al, 83 Zhou et al, 89 and Kleiven and von Holst 34 (Tables 1 and 2). The material behaviour of the brain tissue was modeled as viscoelastic in shear with a deviatoric stress rate dependent on the shear relaxation modulus.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 The UCDBTM was validated against cadaveric pressure responses conducted by Nahum et al 42 and brain motion research conducted by Hardy et al 19 Further validations were conducted by Doorly and Gilchrist 10 and Post et al 60 using reconstructions of real world traumatic brain injury incidents with results that were in agreement with anatomical tissue thresholds. The material characteristics of the model were taken from Ruan, 71 Willinger et al, 83 Zhou et al, 89 and Kleiven and von Holst 34 (Tables 1 and 2). The material behaviour of the brain tissue was modeled as viscoelastic in shear with a deviatoric stress rate dependent on the shear relaxation modulus.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,12,27 Investigators researching SDH using finite element modeling have found that anterior-posterior motion can cause higher strain on the brain tissues and vasculature than lateral motions; 34 however, the study used a tied interface between the skull and brain and was limited, as SDH is thought to result from relative brain skull motion. 16 In 2003, Kleiven 16 used a finite element modeling approach to investigate the directional sensitivity of SDH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While lateral tests were conducted, Kleiven 16 found that the relative brain-skull motion and strains were lower for corresponding rotational impulses and even lower for translational motion. Using a finite element model of the human brain, Zhou et al 34 found that anterior-posterior motions potentially cause higher strains in regions associated with SDH than lateral direction motions. Doorly and Gilchrist, 6 Doorly, 4 Willinger and Baumgartner, 32 and Post et al 26 have also examined the incidence of SDH using injury reconstruction and found that large-magnitude brain deformations were required to create this type of injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UCDBTM had material characteristics that were determined from anatomical testing on cadavers and tissue samples [32][33][34][35][36] (Tables 1, 2). The modeling of the response of the brain tissue was conducted by using a linearly viscoelastic model combined with a large deformation theory.…”
Section: University College Brain Trauma Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%