IntroductionClinical examination (CE) is a cornerstone of modern clinical practice. Proper CE is shown to reduce the risk of medical errors and prevents inappropriate use of diagnostic testing and imaging. Yet despite the impetus on effective training, national studies suggest that final year medical students lack adequate CE sills. There is heterogeneity of healthcare systems, cultures and resources hence it is prudent to assess what interventions are effective within which context. Therefore, the aim of this review was to scope the academic literature for current teaching methods and initiatives in place to teach CE to UK undergraduate medical students.
MethodA search strategy consisting of 11 key terms and Medical Sub-Headings (MeSH) was developed performed in Medline, HMIC, Google Scholar and EMBASE. Two independent reviewers reviewed titles, abstracts or full text articles of relevant papers being assessed for inclusion. A narrative synthesis was undertaken of included papers to examine relationships or themes between studies. The most recent search was undertaken on 30 th September 2019.
ResultsFour papers were published between 2005 to 2013 describing teaching interventions that have been applied or developed for UK undergraduate medical students. Included articles described interventions all in secondary care settings focussed on musculoskeletal examination (n=3) and chest examinations (n=1) utlising simulation teaching (n=1), computer-assisted learning (n=1) and patient educators (n=2).
ConclusionsThis review demonstrates a preliminary review of interventions but the accumulated knowledge is relatively immature. It represents an insight into current research on evaluated teaching methods to teach CE but also serves to Omar A MedEdPublish highlights the vast paucity of available literature on evaluated generalizable interventions. Findings suggest a research agenda is needed to inform future efforts to identify initiatives to better teach CE. The results highlight the immediate focus must include developing ways to objectively evaluate and teaching interventions.