A New Measure of Pulse Rate Variability and Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Improved Time Synchronous Averaging

Abstract

Background. Pulse rate variability monitoring and atrial fibrillation detection algorithms have been widely used in wearable devices, but the accuracies of these algorithms are restricted by the signal quality of pulse wave. Time synchronous averaging is a powerful noise reduction method for periodic and approximately periodic signals. It is usually used to extract single-period pulse waveforms, but has nothing to do with pulse rate variability monitoring and atrial fibrillation detection traditionally. If this method is improved properly, it may provide a new way to measure pulse rate variability and to detect atrial fibrillation, which may have some potential advantages under the condition of poor signal quality. Objective. The objective of this paper was to develop a new measure of pulse rate variability by improving existing time synchronous averaging and to detect atrial fibrillation by the new measure of pulse rate variability. Methods. During time synchronous averaging, two adjacent periods were regarded as the basic unit to calculate the average signal, and the difference between waveforms of the two adjacent periods was the new measure of pulse rate variability. 3 types of distance measures (Euclidean distance, Manhattan distance, and cosine distance) were tested to measure this difference on a simulated training set with a capacity of 1000. The distance measure, which can accurately distinguish regular pulse rate and irregular pulse rate, was used to detect atrial fibrillation on the testing set with a capacity of 62 (11 with atrial fibrillation, 8 with premature contraction, and 43 with sinus rhythm). The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the performance of the indexes. Results. The Euclidean distance between waveforms of the two adjacent periods performs best on the training set. On the testing set, the Euclidean distance in atrial fibrillation group is significantly higher than that of the other two groups. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve to identify atrial fibrillation was 0.998. With the threshold of 2.1, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 98.39%, 100%, and 98.04%, respectively. This new index can detect atrial fibrillation from pulse wave signal. Conclusion. This algorithm not only provides a new perspective to detect AF but also accomplishes the monitoring of PRV and the extraction of single-period pulse wave through the same technical route, which may promote the popularization and application of pulse wave.

Smart Wearables for the Detection of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Literature Review

“…Depending on the type of device used, three categories can be distinguished, namely, wristband devices, belts, and others. For example, in [ 45 , 47 , 55 , 68 , 70 , 80 , 85 , 98 , 103 , 107 , 108 , 112 ], the authors used smartwatches and smart wristbands to record vital signs. In addition, the authors in [ 40 , 44 , 49 , 63 , 64 , 76 , 78 , 83 , 91 , 93 , 96 , 102 , 110 , 120 , 121 ] used various wearable ECG devices such as smart vests and patches.…”

Hybrid CNN-SVR Blood Pressure Estimation Model Using ECG and PPG Signals

“… Both matrices of steps 4 and 5 were concatenated together and saved in CSV format for training and testing the network. As each cardiac cycle interval was considered to be 0.6 s to 1 s, the signals were segmented into the cardiac cycle with a length of 1 s as one beat [ 13 ]. …”

“…As each cardiac cycle interval was considered to be 0.6 s to 1 s, the signals were segmented into the cardiac cycle with a length of 1 s as one beat [ 13 ].…”

A structural approach to 3D-printing arterial phantoms with physiologically comparable mechanical characteristics: Preliminary observations

“…Electrical, fluid dynamic and mechanical noise were reduced by collecting data in 50 wave sets and analyzing the time synchronous ensemble average 55 of the individual pressure waves ( Supplemental Figure 4 ), inlet flows and pulse valve positions. All signals were sampled at 10 ksps and the data acquisition system (DT9826, Measurement Computing Corporation, USA) received a synchronizing signal from the pulse engine.…”

“…Design G pulse profile 2 wave behavior was characterized with sequential data obtained by positioning the pressure sensors at the phantom long axis midpoint then retracting by 5 mm increments until sensors were 5 mm from each phantom end. Electrical, fluid dynamic and mechanical noise were reduced by collecting data in 50 wave sets and analyzing the time synchronous ensemble average 55 of the individual pressure waves (Supplemental Figure 4), inlet flows and pulse valve positions. All signals were sampled at 10 ksps and the data acquisition system (DT9826, Measurement Computing Corporation, USA) received a synchronizing signal from the pulse engine.…”