Background and purpose:The role of serum uric acid (SUA) in prognosis is controversial because SUA levels largely depend on renal clearance function. This study aimed to investigate the association between renal function-normalized SUA (SUA to serum creatinine [SCr] ratio [SUA/SCr ratio]) and poor functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).Methods: All patients were recruited from the Third China National Stroke Registry. Poor functional outcomes were defined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 3-6 or 2-6 at 3 months and 1 year.Results: Among 8169 enrolled patients, the median (interquartile range) SUA/SCr ratio was 4. 19 (3.47-5.08). Compared with patients in the fourth quintile group, those in the first quintile group had higher proportions of mRS scores 3-6 (odds ratio [OR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-1.93) and mRS scores 2-6 (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.53) at 3 months. The addition of SUA/SCr ratio to the conventional risk model had a greater incremental value than the addition of either SUA or SCr alone. Subgroup analysis showed that the association was only significant in patients with normal kidney function (p for interaction<0.05). Similar results were found for outcomes at 1 year.
Conclusions:A lower SUA/SCr ratio was associated with poor functional outcomes in patients with AIS at 3 months and at 1 year, suggesting the potential use of SUA/SCr ratio in clinical practice as a preferable marker for stroke outcomes.
K E Y W O R D Sacute ischemic stroke, poor functional outcomes, prognosis, serum uric acid to serum creatinine ratio
Assessment of outcomesPatients were followed up for clinical outcomes at 3 months and 1 year after symptom onset. They were interviewed in-person at 3 months and contacted by telephone by trained research coordinators at 1 year. Functional outcomes were defined using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, a measure of disability that is widely used for evaluating post-stroke recovery; mRS of 3-6 or 2-6 at 3 months and 1 year, respectively, were considered poor outcomes [17][18][19].All events were collected by trained research coordinators who remained blinded to subjects' baseline characteristics.