2005
DOI: 10.2174/1573409052952323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Group Contribution Approach to the Calculation of LogP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a physicochemical property of a drug candidate widely used in medicinal chemistry as an index of lipophilicity and ability of drug molecule for crossing various biological membranes. 28) According to the Lipinski's rule of five, the log P values more than 5 and molecular weight above 500 g/mol does not qualify as a drug candidate and such compounds might not be appropriate for in vivo administration. 29) In the present studies, except compound C1 (log P 6.758) all other SCs have log P values in a range of 3.069-4.571.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a physicochemical property of a drug candidate widely used in medicinal chemistry as an index of lipophilicity and ability of drug molecule for crossing various biological membranes. 28) According to the Lipinski's rule of five, the log P values more than 5 and molecular weight above 500 g/mol does not qualify as a drug candidate and such compounds might not be appropriate for in vivo administration. 29) In the present studies, except compound C1 (log P 6.758) all other SCs have log P values in a range of 3.069-4.571.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the revised version of KLOGP,44 153 basic parameters were selected based on the diversity of the atoms and their environment inside the molecule. Via MultiCASE (an upgrade of CASE), 41 substructures were identified and used as correction factors in the final log P model: The steric index, H i , represents the steric hindrance of the i th atom by other atoms in the molecule: functional groups next to large substituents weakly contribute to the estimated log P .…”
Section: Substructure‐based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). To reveal the correlation between ligand hydrophobicity and nano-hydrophobicity, we first computed the LogP values for the entire surface ligand using a traditional group contribution approach (GCA) on the basis of ligand structure (KLogP1) [30]. However, the KLogP1 values deviated significantly from the ELogP values, skewing toward higher hydrophobicity value by 3–4 LogP units.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%