2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new formulation of the external field effect in MOND and numerical simulations of ultra-diffuse dwarf galaxies – application to NGC 1052-DF2 and NGC 1052-DF4

Abstract: The ultra-diffuse dwarf galaxy NGC 1052-DF2 (DF2) has ten (eleven) measured globular clusters (GCs) with a line-of-sight velocity dispersion of σ = 7.8 +5.2 −2.2 km/s (σ = 10.6 +3.9 −2.3 km/s). Our conventional statistical analysis of the original ten GCs gives σ = 8.0 +4.3 −3.0 km/s. The overall distribution of velocities agrees well with a Gaussian of this width. Due to the non-linear Poisson equation in MOND, a dwarf galaxy has weaker self-gravity when in close proximity to a massive host. This external fie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
67
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
12
67
2
Order By: Relevance
“…NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 (van Dokkum et al 2018(van Dokkum et al , 2019. Some of the controversy has centred on whether DF2 Contact e-mail: dforbes@swin.edu.au and DF4 lie in the NGC 1052 group at ∼20 Mpc or much closer at ∼13 Mpc Haghi et al 2019); the closer distance would imply a more typical dark matter content. Also debated in the literature is whether DF2 is inconsistent with Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) (van Dokkum et al 2018) or consistent (Haghi et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 (van Dokkum et al 2018(van Dokkum et al , 2019. Some of the controversy has centred on whether DF2 Contact e-mail: dforbes@swin.edu.au and DF4 lie in the NGC 1052 group at ∼20 Mpc or much closer at ∼13 Mpc Haghi et al 2019); the closer distance would imply a more typical dark matter content. Also debated in the literature is whether DF2 is inconsistent with Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) (van Dokkum et al 2018) or consistent (Haghi et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very low intrinsic velocity dispersion of around σ intr = 7.8 +5.2 −2.2 km s −1 (van Dokkum et al 2018a) of an isolated dwarf galaxy would be, according to van Dokkum et al (2018b), in major conflict with modified gravity theories such as Milgromian dynamics (MOND, Milgrom 1983). However, DF2 is close to the massive elliptical galaxy NGC 1052 and taking into account its external field (which is an important prediction of MOND), DF2 becomes well consistent with MOND (Famaey et al 2018;Kroupa et al 2018;Haghi et al 2019;Müller et al 2019). In fact, DF2 is extremely gas-depleted and could be therefore a satellite of NGC 1052, having lost its gas reservoir via ram-pressure stripping and tidal forces triggered by several close encounters (Chowdhury 2019;Sardone et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, their conclusion of the discovery of a dark-matter-deficient galaxy relies on a distance of D = 20 Mpc from Earth. DF2 and also DF4 may be satellites of NGC 1052 and the whole system may be located at a much shorter distance of ≈ 10 Mpc, making their GC populations comparable to those of other galaxies (Haghi et al 2019). In the here presented analysis, we showed that finding similar galaxies in standard cosmology is extremely rare regardless of its actual distance from Earth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout this letter we use the Bayesian framework to describe uncertainties using probabilities and probability distributions (O'Hagan & Forster 2004;Gregory 2005), noting that this approach has been used previously in assessing the veracity of dynamical models of stellar systems (Diakogiannis et al 2014;Mackey et al 2019b). The posterior distribution for parameters Λ given data D is given by…”
Section: Bayesian Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nusser 2018), as well as for alternative models of gravity (e.g. Famaey et al 2018;Haslbauer et al 2019;Haghi et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%