2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new empirical approach for estimation in k-tree sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
58
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the echoes in the tree-less sectors of the PCQ quadrants along with the echoes of the trees associated with those sectors we got a fairly realistic distribution of number of echoes in the different categories, although it is likely that the proportion of tree echoes was somewhat higher than the true proportion because the PCQ method tend to be positively biased [56]. However, we still got about 20 to 100 times more non-tree echoes than tree echoes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By using the echoes in the tree-less sectors of the PCQ quadrants along with the echoes of the trees associated with those sectors we got a fairly realistic distribution of number of echoes in the different categories, although it is likely that the proportion of tree echoes was somewhat higher than the true proportion because the PCQ method tend to be positively biased [56]. However, we still got about 20 to 100 times more non-tree echoes than tree echoes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One useful and rapid method for forest inventory is c-tree sampling-also referred to as n-tree distance sampling (Lessard et al, 1994; Spatial Distribution and Composition of Trees in an Aging Coppice Forest 37 Lynch and Rusydi, 1999;Lessard et al, 2002;Lynch and Wittwer, 2003), density-adapted sampling (Jonsson et al, 1992), k -tree sampling (Kleinn and Vilčko, 2006) or plotless ordered distance sampling (Engeman et al, 1994). The advantage of using c-tree sampling is mostly in its simple design and its ability to reduce the cost of field surveys when compared with conventional methods used in forestry (Jonsson et al, 1992;Lessard et al, 1994;Lynch and Rusydi, 1999;Husch et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general those protocols are a form of unequal probability sampling for populations of discrete objects (Affleck et al 2005). They present the analyst with difficult measurements if the determination of design-unbiased inclusion probabilities is targeted (Kleinn and Vilčko 2006b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases a bias of unknown magnitude presumably is an acceptable tradeoff for the relatively easy implementation of the sampling techniques in the field (Kleinn and Vilčko 2006b;Barabesi 2001;Magnussen et al 2008b). The main argument for plotless approaches is that the fixed number of population units included per sample point result in a constant survey effort per sample point (Kronenfeld 2009;Nothdurft et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%