2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new data fusion model for high spatial- and temporal-resolution mapping of forest disturbance based on Landsat and MODIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
403
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 586 publications
(406 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
403
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Predicted Landsat images are degraded in quality for cases featuring fine-grained spatial heterogeneity and complex mixtures of cover types. Hilker et al (2009) demonstrated the value of STARFM for monitoring forest disturbance in Canada, where clouds often obscure Landsat images for several sequential 16-day acquisitions, by adapting the algorithm using 8-day MODIS composites to detect the 8-day period within which individual, Landsat-resolution disturbances occurred.…”
Section: Integrated Change Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicted Landsat images are degraded in quality for cases featuring fine-grained spatial heterogeneity and complex mixtures of cover types. Hilker et al (2009) demonstrated the value of STARFM for monitoring forest disturbance in Canada, where clouds often obscure Landsat images for several sequential 16-day acquisitions, by adapting the algorithm using 8-day MODIS composites to detect the 8-day period within which individual, Landsat-resolution disturbances occurred.…”
Section: Integrated Change Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our algorithm does not account for this scale of sub-pixel variation, which means that results will be most reliable for areas with large field sizes. The effects of spatial heterogeneity is a common challenge for MODIS-based studies of land use and land cover change because most land use and land cover conversions occur below the spatial resolution of MODIS [68][69][70].…”
Section: Factors That Influence the Mapping Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To alleviate this, we used a combination of historical aerial interpreted photographs with disturbance maps from land management agencies. Change or disturbance-based classifications require time-series reference data to define change areas through auto segmentation, or they are manually digitized by experienced image analysts [25,29,60]. We collected aerial photography from the National Historical Air Photo Archive (NHAP) for the early 1980s and the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) for the early 1990s and 2000s to evaluate the forest harvest and insect disturbances that we detected with our classification.…”
Section: Independent Classification Evaluation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%