2017
DOI: 10.1002/joc.5063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new conventional regression model to estimate hourly photosynthetic photon flux density under all sky conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
26
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…• , with a standard deviation of 0.15 • . The ⁄ ratio had similar values to those reported by other researchers [15], ranging between 1.21 and 2.84…”
Section: Temporal Variability Of the ⁄ Ratiosupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• , with a standard deviation of 0.15 • . The ⁄ ratio had similar values to those reported by other researchers [15], ranging between 1.21 and 2.84…”
Section: Temporal Variability Of the ⁄ Ratiosupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The monthly Q p /R s average was calculated on a daily basis from experimental data [14] collected in an arid climate at between 2.02 and 2.19 µmol•J −1 and the mean daily value was 2.16 µmol•J −1 . In Spain, Foyo-Moreno et al [15] estimated a mean value of 1.95 µmol•J −1 a value close to other values from different locations [3,16]. Hu et al [17] evaluated the Q p /R s ratio at many locations within China at between 1.75 µmol•J −1 and 2.30 µmol•J −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Combinations of sets of variables that are commonly used in the bibliography were selected as GHI, RH, T, k t , cos θ, and the product k t •cos θ. Examples of models that utilize these variables can be found in [25,26,[32][33][34][38][39][40][41][59][60][61][62][63]. The aim making different combinations of them is to produce different models so that we can compare them and choose which model is the best and which variables are more interesting for PAR modeling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, data collected on the Earth's surface, such as global horizontal irradiance (GHI), air temperature (T), relative humidity (RH), sky clearness, skylight brightness parameter, and clearness index (k t ), can also develop PAR models [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. It is also possible to train artificial neural networks (ANNs) to produce PAR estimates [39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [31], variables such as GHI, global extraterrestrial irradiance, sunshine fraction, air temperature, and relative humidity were input data to train several ANNs, producing PAR models over Athalassa, Cyprus. On the other hand, in [32], several combinations of input data such as global solar irradiance, solar azimuth cosine, and clearness index were used to develop PAR ANN models. In [33], PAR was estimated by ANNs based on different inputs: global solar irradiance, clearness index, solar azimuth angle, air relative humidity, sky brightness, air dew point temperature, sky clearness, and total precipitable water thickness.…”
Section: Kato Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%