2018
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2017.2714644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Bi-Objective Approach to Energy Management in Distribution Networks with Energy Storage Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Does not specify the constraints of ESS, such as the maximum rate of charging and discharging constraints [74] Presents a multi-objective approach to minimizing operation costs while improving reliability of a distribution network…”
Section: Derives Reliability Model Of An Ess and Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Does not specify the constraints of ESS, such as the maximum rate of charging and discharging constraints [74] Presents a multi-objective approach to minimizing operation costs while improving reliability of a distribution network…”
Section: Derives Reliability Model Of An Ess and Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RETScreen is widely used across the globe such as in the feasibility assessment of wind farm development based in Algeria, solar PV in Egypt, and solar water heating in Lebanon . The simulation code also works for the smart building concept powered by a PV system and to reduce carbon emission in residential areas …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous conducted study on the integration of EES with solar energy includes optimization techniques, a probabilistic approach, batteries calculation technique, reliability analysis, and techniques to decrease the operational cost of an adequate stand‐alone solar power system…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user maximizes the reduction of non-essential load for reducing the expenditure, according to his own needs. In other periods (8,(18)(19), the electricity prices are at a medium level, the load need is lower, and the expenditure is within the acceptable range. Therefore, no adjustment is made.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the higher load level periods (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), MEG raises the price within the user acceptable range in order to maximize the profit. In other periods (8,(18)(19), user loads are at a medium level, MEG chooses the highest price under the condition of ensuring the lowest user dissatisfaction to maximize the profit. (3) When comparing the electrical optimal outputs and production costs of MEG in Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, we can see that the grid mode has better economy than the isolated island mode.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%