2011
DOI: 10.1107/s0108767311099132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to crystal-structure prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
217
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
19
217
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus [8] Bi 3+ compares very well with [6] I 5+ ($ 40 coordination polyhedra for the same level of agreement for grand mean bond lengths, and only two coordination polyhedra for skewness and kurtosis; Gagné & Hawthorne, 2018) despite significantly weaker bond strengths, due to the overwhelming effect of lone-pair stereoactivity on the bond-length distributions of these ions. For [4] Si 4+ , more data is needed than for [4] S 6+ (approximately five coordination polyhedra; Gagné & Hawthorne, 2018) for a reliable value of the grand mean bond length, probably due to the formation of relatively weaker bonds. However, significantly less data are needed for [4] Si 4+ in comparison to [4] S 6+ ($ 300 coordination polyhedra; Gagné & Hawthorne, 2018) to obtain reliable values of skewness and kurtosis.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus [8] Bi 3+ compares very well with [6] I 5+ ($ 40 coordination polyhedra for the same level of agreement for grand mean bond lengths, and only two coordination polyhedra for skewness and kurtosis; Gagné & Hawthorne, 2018) despite significantly weaker bond strengths, due to the overwhelming effect of lone-pair stereoactivity on the bond-length distributions of these ions. For [4] Si 4+ , more data is needed than for [4] S 6+ (approximately five coordination polyhedra; Gagné & Hawthorne, 2018) for a reliable value of the grand mean bond length, probably due to the formation of relatively weaker bonds. However, significantly less data are needed for [4] Si 4+ in comparison to [4] S 6+ ($ 300 coordination polyhedra; Gagné & Hawthorne, 2018) to obtain reliable values of skewness and kurtosis.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 64%
“…This analysis is summarized in the previous paper of this series (Gagné & Hawthorne, 2018). As we did for the non-metal ions with lone-pair stereoactive electrons, here we derive coordination polyhedra using the method described by Gagné & Hawthorne (2016a), which leads to the inclusion of all interatomic distances in the first coordination shell of the cations. This method leads to observed coordination numbers up to [12] for four lone-pair stereoactive cations, Tl + , Pb 2+ , Bi 3+ and Te 4+ , and to coordination numbers up to [14] for Ba 2+ , [15] for K + , [18] for Rb + , and [20] for Cs + (Gagné & Hawthorne, 2016a).…”
Section: Coordination Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From GO to FGS‐1000, remarkably decreased oxygen atomic contents from 30.47% to 0.7% are calculated and depicted in Figure f. Additionally, due to the higher binding energy of C = O bonds, the ratio of C = O groups among all oxygen functional groups for each sample increases with the rise of treatment temperature, showing a high retention around 80% for C = O groups after the second step of heat treatment . Among the FGS samples, FGS‐700 possesses the highest amount of C = O groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The coordination number of Na is not easy to determine. <Na-O> distances for coordination numbers [7], [8] and [9] are all ~0.1 Å larger that the corresponding grand <Na-O> distances given by Gagné & Hawthorne (2016b) for ordered mineral and inorganic crystal-structures. Here we will calculate the a priori bond-valences for Na coordination numbers [7], [8] and [9] to see how sensitive the calculations are to different choices of coordination number.…”
Section: Albitementioning
confidence: 99%