EEG research dating back 70 years has established the presence of various degrees of EEG abnormalities in children with ADHD (named 'behaviour problem children' in those times). These early cross-sectional studies used visual evaluation of paper recordings of the EEG; the most common finding with this methodology was an increase in slow wave activity in ADHD children, often frontal, which is largely consistent with modern data. Although these studies provide invaluable insights into common mechanisms underlying clinical symptoms and neurocognitive deficits in general, the heterogeneity of ADHD requires further steps. The aetiology, clinical picture and course of the behavioural phenotype called ADHD is most probably related to a variety of pathophysiological pathways, a multitude of genes and various environmental influences.Doehnert and colleagues' article in this issue (Doehnert et al., 2013) illustrates the value of longitudinal electrophysiological and experimental approaches to disentangle different pathways underlying the phenotype of ADHD. Their contribution is a unique first electrophysiological follow-up of ADHD children as young adults. The article gives an initial idea in which direction research might proceed. It has inspiring implications for both clinicians and researchers.The authors carried out a longitudinal study of neuropsychological and electrophysiological markers of attention, inhibitory control and time processing in a sample of subjects with ADHD and normal controls diagnosed in childhood to analyse trajectories of developmental delay versus developmental deviation.Data from a 3-year follow-up of this sample have been published before, and revealed both aspects of developmental lag (for markers of response inhibition) and developmental deviation (for time estimation and attentional functions) during adolescence. The present additional follow-up of the same sample is critical as it covers a substantial time window from mean age 13 to mean age 22 with major developmental changes. Despite the attrition and the small samples surprisingly clear results emerged. The exciting message becomes apparent only by the concomitant presentation of the results for various ERP components relating to preparation and time processing (CNV) and inhibition and attention (NoGo P300, Cue P300), and the splitted analysis for ADHD remitters and non-remitters. By doing so, different developmental trajectories become apparent.The Cue P300, NoGo P300 and perceptual sensitivity in older ADHD subjects resembled those of younger controls; these group differences diminished in early adulthood. In contrast, abnormalities of the CNV and reaction time variability remained detectable in young adult ADHD subjects, even in ADHD remitters, compared to controls. Both CNV and reaction time variability have been proposed to be related to impaired timing. The results seem to indicate residual timing deficits even in young adults with remitted ADHD.An increasing amount of scientific evidence mirrors the clinical knowledge that tempo...