Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conferen 2019
DOI: 10.18653/v1/d19-1497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Neural Citation Count Prediction Model based on Peer Review Text

Abstract: Citation count prediction (CCP) has been an important research task for automatically estimating the future impact of a scholarly paper. Previous studies mainly focus on extracting or mining useful features from the paper itself or the associated authors. An important kind of data signals, i.e., peer review text, has not been utilized for the CCP task. In this paper, we take the initiative to utilize peer review data for the CCP task with a neural prediction model. Our focus is to learn a comprehensive semanti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, based on the characteristics of highly cited papers, Yan et al applied a regression model to study the interesting citation count prediction [ 22 ]. Li et al use the comprehensive semantic representation of peer-reviewed data learning papers to establish a neural prediction model to improve the citation prediction performance [ 23 ]. Second, the prediction of rise and fall of the topic attracted many scholars.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, based on the characteristics of highly cited papers, Yan et al applied a regression model to study the interesting citation count prediction [ 22 ]. Li et al use the comprehensive semantic representation of peer-reviewed data learning papers to establish a neural prediction model to improve the citation prediction performance [ 23 ]. Second, the prediction of rise and fall of the topic attracted many scholars.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicting Performance from Language Previous research in natural language processing has explored the connections between textual features and audience engagement in books (Ganjigunte Ashok et al, 2013;Maharjan et al, 2018), YouTube (Kleinberg et al, 2018), news (Naseri and Zamani, 2019), TED talks (Tanveer et al, 2018), and tweets (Tan et al, 2014;Lampos et al, 2014). Other works have modeled the relationship between text and various performance metrics such as movie quote memorability (Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil et al, 2012), forecasting ability (Zong et al, 2020), congressional bill survival (Yano et al, 2012), success of job interviews (Naim et al, 2016), and impact of academic papers (Yogatama et al, 2011;Li et al, 2019), in addition to the entire field of sentiment and opinion mining of data such as user reviews (Pang et al, 2002).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent work focuses on predicting the number of citations from the paper text augmented with review text. To do so, Li et al (2019) created a dataset of abstracts and reviews from the ICLR and NIPS conferences: 1739 abstracts with a total of 7171 reviews for ICLR and 384 abstracts with 1119 reviews for NIPS. Plank and van Dale (2019) collect a dataset of 3427 papers with 12260 reviews.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%