For most of the last two centuries, Native Greenlandic teachers had been left out of the decisionmaking process regarding effective education for Greenlandic students. Rather, Danish education and church officials, living in Denmark, made important pedagogical and curricular decisions with little to no input from local teachers (Jakobsen, 1999). This article describes a collaborative effort between Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE) professional developers and Greenlandic teachers in the design and implementation of a coaching model that includes Native Greenlandic ways of teaching and learning. Implications for other professional developers and researchers in education doing similar work are included.For most of the last two centuries, Native Greenlandic teachers had been left out of the decision-making process regarding effective education for Greenlandic students. Rather, the Danish colonial government, responsible for developing Greenland's educational system, made important pedagogical and curricular decisions with little to no input from local teachers (Jakobsen, 1999). This practice resulted in the development of a school system that modeled education in Denmark and elsewhere in Scandinavia, and by all accounts has failed the indigenous Greenlandic population (Wyatt, 2007).With the establishment of Home Rule government in 1979, the first step toward equity in the Greenlandic school system was taken. Home Rule gave the local Greenlanders full decisionmaking authority in all areas related to the church, education, and culture. One of the first decisions educational leaders made was to launch a country-wide effort toward the Greenlandization of the country's schools. These decisions included a complete overhaul of Greenland's curriculum, pedagogical methods, forms of assessment, and measures of achievement.To ensure community buy-in and support, leaders transformed the way decisions were made to include more input from the local Greenlandic population. For example, students were tasked with writing essays specifying their thoughts on educational innovation and what they wanted to achieve by graduation. Teachers and parents were invited to conferences to share their perspective on pedagogy and other curricular issues. In effect, the top-down model of decision-making,