2013
DOI: 10.1111/jan.12273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A national cross‐sectional study measuring predictors for improved service user outcomes across clinical nurse or midwife specialist, advanced nurse practitioner and control sites

Abstract: Further studies evaluating advanced health professions roles measuring these six key outcomes, at a minimum, will ensure that service users' main concerns are being accounted for.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For another 13 instruments, it was not possible access the full questionnaire; therefore, we could not assess the single items used within the questionnaires, and hence, the elements of psychosocial fundamentals of care under investigation were not clear to the reader (Caring Behaviors Inventory (CBI): Aupia, Lee, Liu, Wu, & Mills, 2018; He et al, 2013; Papastavrou et al, 2012a; Papastavrou et al, 2012b; Patient Needs Assessment in Palliative Care (PNAP): Buzgova, Kozakova, Sikorova, Zelenikova, & Jarosova, 2016; questionnaire used by Comiskey et al, 2014; questionnaire used by Ehrlander, Ali, & Chretien, 2009; Revised Humane Caring Scale (RHCS): Goh, Ang, Chan, He, & Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2016; questionnaire used by Göransson & Von Rosen, 2010; questionnaire used by Raee, Abedi, & Shahriari, 2017; Consumer Quality index (CQ‐index): Teunissen, Rotink, & Lagro‐Janssen, 2016; and questionnaire used by Yousuf, Fauzi, How, Akter, & Shah, 2009). This is despite in some cases a clear statement that the element of psychosocial fundamentals of care being investigated was witnessed by a clear statement in the title of the tool (Inherent Dignity Questionnaire (IDQ), Social Dignity Questionnaire (SDQ) and Dignity Conserving Repertoire Questionnaire (DCRQ): Bagheri, Yaghmaei, Ashktorab, & Zayeri, 2018a; Bagheri, Yaghmaei, Ashktorab, & Zayeri, 2018b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For another 13 instruments, it was not possible access the full questionnaire; therefore, we could not assess the single items used within the questionnaires, and hence, the elements of psychosocial fundamentals of care under investigation were not clear to the reader (Caring Behaviors Inventory (CBI): Aupia, Lee, Liu, Wu, & Mills, 2018; He et al, 2013; Papastavrou et al, 2012a; Papastavrou et al, 2012b; Patient Needs Assessment in Palliative Care (PNAP): Buzgova, Kozakova, Sikorova, Zelenikova, & Jarosova, 2016; questionnaire used by Comiskey et al, 2014; questionnaire used by Ehrlander, Ali, & Chretien, 2009; Revised Humane Caring Scale (RHCS): Goh, Ang, Chan, He, & Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2016; questionnaire used by Göransson & Von Rosen, 2010; questionnaire used by Raee, Abedi, & Shahriari, 2017; Consumer Quality index (CQ‐index): Teunissen, Rotink, & Lagro‐Janssen, 2016; and questionnaire used by Yousuf, Fauzi, How, Akter, & Shah, 2009). This is despite in some cases a clear statement that the element of psychosocial fundamentals of care being investigated was witnessed by a clear statement in the title of the tool (Inherent Dignity Questionnaire (IDQ), Social Dignity Questionnaire (SDQ) and Dignity Conserving Repertoire Questionnaire (DCRQ): Bagheri, Yaghmaei, Ashktorab, & Zayeri, 2018a; Bagheri, Yaghmaei, Ashktorab, & Zayeri, 2018b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies involved patients only ( n = 36), hospitalised in different care units (e.g. cardiology n = 4; oncology and palliative care n = 11), although most studies occurred across various clinical specialities (Borhani et al, 2014; Bruyneel et al, 2017; Chaplin et al, 2015; Chochinov et al, 2016; Chung et al, 2018; Comiskey et al, 2014; Ehrlander et al, 2009; Ferri et al, 2015; Fröjd et al, 2011; Gattinger et al, 2013; Goh, Ang, Chan, He, & Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2015; Goh et al, 2016; Hall et al, 2013; Hargreaves et al, 2012; He et al, 2013; Kim et al, 2017; Ota et al, 2019; Otani et al, 2011; Papastavrou et al, 2012b; Periyakoil et al, 2009; Raee et al, 2017; Tauber‐Gilmore et al, 2018; Teunissen et al, 2016; Udomluck et al, 2010; Wu et al, 2015; Yousuf et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…); to obtain feedback to healthcare workers to improve quality of care (Cominskey et al . ), or as an outcome measure to evaluate organizational changes (Metzelthin et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within Europe and the United States some evaluation of the impact of these roles on the profession, clinical care, education and the service user has been carried out by Bryant et al (2004), Begley et al (2010), Kennedy et al (2012) and Comiskey et al (2013) and all found positive impacts of the expanded role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Riegel, Sullivan-Marx and Fairman (2012) nurse practitioners are nurses who have acquired advanced clinical and decision making skills and usually hold a master's degree. They assert that 23 countries formally recognise this role and believe these roles can be used to address some of the global demands within healthcare services and practice.Within Europe and the United States some evaluation of the impact of these roles on the profession, clinical care, education and the service user has been carried out by Bryant et al (2004), Begley et al (2010), Kennedy et al (2012) and Comiskey et al (2013) and all found positive impacts of the expanded role. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%