“…One dppm ligand (P9,10) bridges the two C 2 related Cu atoms of the Cu 6 core (Cu3, Cu6), and the other four dppm ligands are disposed aroundt he pseudo C 2 axis with connecting the capping Cu atoms to the octahedron. The H107 and H108 atoms bridge on the triangles of (Cu2,4,6) and (Cu1, 3,5), and the H109 and H112 atoms on those of (Cu2,3,7) and (Cu5,6,8), respectively,i nm 3 -fashiona so bserved in [CuH(PR 3 )] 6 (R = NMe 2 , p-tolyl, p-anisyl, R 3 = iPrPh 2 ), [4c,e,g] with the CuÀHd istances ranging from 1.68 to 1.93 .T he disposition of H110 and H111 atoms is largely deformed from the pseudo C 2 symmetry due to asymmetrica rrangements of the phenyl groups on P1 and P5 atoms;t he H110 atom bridges on the inner (Cu1,2,4) triangle but the H111 atom caps the outer (Cu4,5,8) trianglew eakly interacting with Cu1 (2.29 )i nadistorted m 4 -bridging mode (Supporting Information FigureS3c). [4d] Since the crystalso f1 were too small for neutron diffraction study and the hydride positions are not able to be determined precisely by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, the six hydride positions were evaluated by DFT optimization with B3LYP functionals and lanl2dz (for Cu), 6-311 + G(d,p) (for hydride H), and 6-31G(d) (for others) basis sets.…”