A Municipality-Based Approach Using Commuting Census Data to Characterize the Vulnerability to Influenza-Like Epidemic: The COVID-19 Application in Italy

Abstract

In February 2020, Italy became the epicenter for COVID-19 in Europe, and at the beginning of March, the Italian Government put in place emergency measures to restrict population movement. Aim of our analysis is to provide a better understanding of the epidemiological context of COVID-19 in Italy, using commuting data at a high spatial resolution, characterizing the territory in terms of vulnerability. We used a Susceptible–Infectious stochastic model and we estimated a municipality-specific infection contact rate (β) to capture the susceptibility to the disease. We identified in Lombardy, Veneto and Emilia Romagna regions (52% of all Italian cases) significant clusters of high β, due to the simultaneous presence of connections between municipalities and high population density. Local simulated spreading in regions, with different levels of infection observed, showed different disease geographical patterns due to different β values and commuting systems. In addition, we produced a vulnerability map (in the Abruzzi region as an example) by simulating the epidemic considering each municipality as a seed. The result shows the highest vulnerability values in areas with commercial hubs, close to the highest populated cities and the most industrial area. Our results highlight how human mobility can affect the epidemic, identifying particular situations in which the health authorities can promptly intervene to control the disease spread.

Understanding the Impact of Walkability, Population Density, and Population Size on COVID-19 Spread: A Pilot Study of the Early Contagion in the United States

“…For example, masks were not recommended in the U.S. until 3 April 2020, and vaccines were not widely available until the following year. Accordingly, the work of [15] shows that, in Italy, the highest spread rates occurred in areas with commercial hubs, close to the highest populated cities, and the most industrial area. Their results indicate how human mobility can affect the epidemic, identifying particular situations in which the health authorities can promptly intervene to control the spread of the disease.…”

Spatiotemporal Dynamics of COVID-19 Infections in Mainland Portugal

“…The same can be said about the analysis of hotspots in the work of [43], who identified the existence of SARS-CoV-2 transmission hotspots in Chinese territory based on two conditions: proximity to the region of the initial outbreak and a population size greater than 10 million inhabitants. Cluster analysis techniques from a spatiotemporal perspective have also been applied to identify areas of recurrence of infections [44], distinguishing aggregate sets of incidence and anomalous situations [45]. Still in the field of spatial dependence, the analysis of the spatial autocorrelation of the distribution of the number of COVID-19 cases has been preferably studied using the Moran's I index [46].…”

A tale of two epicentres: Lombardy and New York City at the outbreak of the Coronavirus pandemic

“…The western part of the region of Lombardy is centred chiefly around Milan, with many workers commuting there daily from the provinces of Pavia, Monza, Varese, Como, Lodi, and Lecco. By contrast, the eastern side of the region – where Brescia and Bergamo are located – is characterised by small and medium-sized clusters of enterprises, the famed ‘Third Italy’ (Bagnasco 1977, 1988) – giving rise to intense daily flows of goods and people that move mainly within those provinces (Lombardi et al 2021; Savini et al 2020; Baccini et al 2015).…”