2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiplex PCR assay for fraud identification of deer products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limit of detection for the different methods is comparable to that obtained in another study using the same target (Lopéz-Andreo et al, 2005), lower than those obtained by Zha, Xing, and Yang (2010) using mitochondrial genes in an "end point" PCR and lower than those showed by Laube et al (2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The limit of detection for the different methods is comparable to that obtained in another study using the same target (Lopéz-Andreo et al, 2005), lower than those obtained by Zha, Xing, and Yang (2010) using mitochondrial genes in an "end point" PCR and lower than those showed by Laube et al (2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This technique has also been applied to authenticate several other species, including sea cucumbers (Zuo et al, 2012) and mackerel (Catanese et al, 2010), and to uncover meat scandals, such as venison (Zha et al, 2010) and abalone products (Chan et al, 2012). Therefore, multiplex PCR with a novel primer set (KUGEN-ILSspec) could be an effective tool for prevention Downloaded by [University of Windsor] at 18:07 19 November 2014…”
Section: Pcr Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a low concentration of DNA templates was also adequate for detecting mixed templates of L. lunaris, L. spadiceus and L. inermis. The detection limit of 1 ng/µL concentration of DNA templates is considered as highly sensitive when compared to bovine-specific primers, poultry-specific primers (Zha et al, 2010), and Scomber-specific primers (Catanese et al, 2010). Therefore, our puffer fish specific primers could be effective for managing food fraud and safety control.…”
Section: Sensitivity Test Of Multiplex Pcr Primermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since mtDNA occurs in high copy numbers in each cell and is able to withstand degradation and environmental challenges, it is well suited for use in food authentication assays. MtDNA assays have already been developed and used for species testing in food safety management and fraudulence using both end-point PCR and qPCR techniques (Dooley et al 2004;Köppel et al 2009;Woolfe and Primrose 2004;Dalmasso et al 2004;Zha et al 2010;Rodriguez et al 2003;Fumiere et al 2006;Eugster et al 2009;Tanabe et al 2007). Despite mtDNA's durability (Hajibabaei et al 2007), nuclear loci are more advantageous for DNA quantification because the diploid (instead of multiple) copy number Walker et al 2004) makes it more predictive of nuclear DNA profiling success and more relevant to identity testing and sample traceability than multi-copy and/or non-nuclear markers (Alonso et al 2004;Timken et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of species determination and nuclear DNA quantification into a single assay will streamline downstream genotyping analysis, and improve the quality of the DNA profiles while conserving reagents (Evans et al 2007;Lindquist et al 2011;Kanthaswamy et al 2012). Many of the DNA-based food authentication assays are multiplexed end-point PCR assays (Dalmasso et al 2004;Zha et al 2010;Ghovvati et al 2009;Rodriguez et al 2003). A majority of these protocols require subsequent steps such as restriction enzyme digestion or gel electrophoresis for species identification after PCR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%