A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial of Perioperative Palliative Care Surrounding Cancer Surgery for Patients and Their Family Members (PERIOP-PC)

Abstract

Background: Despite positive outcomes associated with specialist palliative care (PC) in diverse medical populations, little research has investigated specialist PC in surgical ones. Although cancer surgery is predominantly safe, operations can be extensive and unpredictable perioperative morbidity and mortality persist, particularly for patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Objectives and Hypotheses: Our objective is to complete a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing surgeon-PC co-management with surgeon-alone management among patients pursuing curative-intent surgery for upper GI cancers. We hypothesize that perioperative PC will improve patient postsurgical quality of life. This study and design are based on >8 years of engagement and research with patients, family members, and clinicians surrounding major cancer surgery and advance care planning/PC for surgical patients. Methods: Randomized controlled superiority trial with two study arms (surgeon-PC team co-management and surgeon-alone management) and five data collection points over six months. The principal investigator and analysts are blinded to randomization. Setting: Four, geographically diverse, academic tertiary care hospitals. Data collection began December 20, 2018 and continues to December 2020. Participants: Patients recruited from surgical oncology clinics who are undergoing curative-intent surgery for an upper GI cancer. Interventions: In the intervention arm, patients receive care from both their surgical team and a specialist PC team; the PC is provided before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at least monthly until three months postsurgery. Patients randomized to the usual care arm receive care from only the surgical team. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome: patient quality of life. Secondary outcomes: patient: symptom experience, spiritual distress, prognostic awareness, health care utilization, and mortality. Caregiver: quality of life, caregiver burden, spiritual distress, and prognostic awareness. Intent-to-treat analysis will be used. Ethics and Dissemination: This study has been approved by the institutional review boards of all study sites and is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03611309, First received: August 2, 2018).

Primary palliative care for surgeons: a narrative review and synthesis of core competencies

“…Surgical PC experts have touted collaboration with nonsurgical PC experts for decades, both from outside and inside the ICU (8,29,30). Most surgeons, however, fail to consult PC experts, such that PC collaboration on surgical patients remains underutilized (31)(32)(33) despite the proven benefits of PC for many surgical patient populations (34,35). The most studied surgical patients with unmet PC needs have advanced malignancies, need emergency general surgery, or suffer from traumatic injuries.…”

Improving quality in colon and rectal surgery through palliative care

“…There are currently two studies recruiting patients to characterize the outcome of early palliative care in patients with GI malignancies undergoing surgery, although neither is specifically focused on cancers of the lower gastrointestinal tract. 41 , 42 …”

Cytotoxic, Antitumor and Toxicological Profile of Passiflora alata Leaf Extract

“…More than 100 types of cancers have already been characterized, for which some type of systemic or local treatment has been proposed for curative or palliative purposes [ 1 , 2 ]. However, systemic chemotherapy is still the most widely used, together with local therapies, such as surgery and/or radiation therapy.…”