2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-proxy approach reveals common and species-specific features associated with tree defoliation in broadleaved species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our temporal analysis also indicates a negative effect of crown defoliation (TotDef) on DM100 of beech (Table 4). The negative relationship between TotDef and DM100 is in line with the findings of Gottardini et al (2020), who additionally reported a decrease in leaf volume and photosynthetic efficiency with increasing defoliation. Thus, a thinned-out crown could indicate leaf loss due to drought-induced embolism or parasites, but at the same time allows more irradiance to reach inside the canopy, which has been shown to influence LMTs (e.g., Poorter et al, 2009).…”
Section: Mast Year and Crown Defoliation Effects On Leaf Morphological Traitssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our temporal analysis also indicates a negative effect of crown defoliation (TotDef) on DM100 of beech (Table 4). The negative relationship between TotDef and DM100 is in line with the findings of Gottardini et al (2020), who additionally reported a decrease in leaf volume and photosynthetic efficiency with increasing defoliation. Thus, a thinned-out crown could indicate leaf loss due to drought-induced embolism or parasites, but at the same time allows more irradiance to reach inside the canopy, which has been shown to influence LMTs (e.g., Poorter et al, 2009).…”
Section: Mast Year and Crown Defoliation Effects On Leaf Morphological Traitssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, a thinned-out crown could indicate leaf loss due to drought-induced embolism or parasites, but at the same time allows more irradiance to reach inside the canopy, which has been shown to influence LMTs (e.g., Poorter et al, 2009). Given that TotDef is determined by multiple factors, it remains difficult to discern whether TotDef is really a driver of LMTs or simply reflects the health and leaf condition of the trees (Gottardini et al, 2020).…”
Section: Mast Year and Crown Defoliation Effects On Leaf Morphological Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This wealth of data has shown that most of the variability associated with crown transparency assessments is the result of methodological differences, differences in tree age, and some climatic factors, mainly drought [30], rather than air pollution [8]. Crown transparency is therefore not a good indicator of tree vitality, although it continues to be recommended as an indicator when used in association with other indices of crown condition [31][32][33].…”
Section: Crown Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) in the sample may indicate a disturbance in developmental stability caused by environmental and / or genomic stress (Rodrigues-Gonzalez et al, 2020). The magnitude of the fluctuating leaf asymmetry is an indicator of developmental stability, as well as a marker of the quality of the habitat, used for both plants and animals (Abdulsamad et al 2020, Gottardini et al 2020, Francuski et al 2020. By the value of FA (Table 1), it is important to note that all oak forests, with the exception of the area 3 (0.056), have coefficients not exceeding 0.04, thus they are resistant to the anthropogenic factor.…”
Section: Morphological Analysis Of Maternal Populations Of English Oak Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%