2009
DOI: 10.1080/09500690903258246
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: This study proposes a multi-dimensional approach to investigate, represent, and categorize students' in-depth understanding of complex physics concepts. Clinical interviews were conducted with 30 undergraduate physics students to probe their understanding of heat conduction. Based on the data analysis, six aspects of the participants' responses were identified as nominal scales and designated as six dimensions in a multi-axis (star) diagram to represent their in-depth understanding of heat conduction. The resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, a variety of research methods have been conducted on the study of knowledge structure in science education. The methods include concept map (Adamov et al, 2009;Burrows & Mooring, 2015;Chiang et al, 2014), word association (Bahar & Tongac, 2009;Nakiboglu, 2008), phenomenological approach (Choi & Oh, 2021;Tóth & Ludányi, 2007), think-aloud interview (Ahmadian et al, 2019;King et al, 2022), multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) (Chiou & Anderson, 2010;Tilga et al, 2017), knowledge space theory (Segedinac et al, 2018), pathfinder network algorithm (Casas-Garcia & Luengo-Gonzalez, 2013), factor analysis , and reaction time technique .…”
Section: Knowledge Structure and Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, a variety of research methods have been conducted on the study of knowledge structure in science education. The methods include concept map (Adamov et al, 2009;Burrows & Mooring, 2015;Chiang et al, 2014), word association (Bahar & Tongac, 2009;Nakiboglu, 2008), phenomenological approach (Choi & Oh, 2021;Tóth & Ludányi, 2007), think-aloud interview (Ahmadian et al, 2019;King et al, 2022), multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) (Chiou & Anderson, 2010;Tilga et al, 2017), knowledge space theory (Segedinac et al, 2018), pathfinder network algorithm (Casas-Garcia & Luengo-Gonzalez, 2013), factor analysis , and reaction time technique .…”
Section: Knowledge Structure and Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%